Skip to main content
The Long Run with Luke Timmerman

Ep187: Eric Fischer on Creating a New Class of Medicines

65 min episode · 3 min read
·
Eric Fischer

Episode

65 min

Read time

3 min

Topics

Productivity, Relationships, Startups

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Thalidomide as clinical proof of concept: The 2014 discovery that thalidomide and lenalidomide work by binding ubiquitin ligase cereblon and degrading transcription factors IKZF1 and IKZF3 provided overnight clinical validation for an entirely new drug class. Millions of multiple myeloma patients were already safely taking these drugs, eliminating the need to prove the mechanism could work in humans — a shortcut that compressed years off the field's development timeline.
  • Molecular glues vs. PROTACs — size determines tractability: PROTACs use two warheads connected by a linker, often exceeding 1,000 daltons, creating challenges with solubility, permeability, and plasma protein binding that complicate dose prediction. Molecular glues like thalidomide, at roughly 260 daltons, face none of those barriers. When selecting a degrader modality, smaller targets with no existing binding pocket favor molecular glues; well-characterized targets with known binders are more compatible with PROTAC approaches.
  • Mass spectrometry cataloging to unlock molecular glue targets: Because molecular glues lack predictable design rules, Fischer's lab uses mass spectrometry to systematically identify which proteins become susceptible to degradation when glue derivatives are modified. Diversifying the chemical scaffold and mapping resulting target shifts builds a catalog researchers can then optimize against a specific disease target — converting a historically serendipitous process into a structured, repeatable discovery workflow.
  • Composite protein surface mimics antibody CDR logic: Molecular glues work by presenting a small chemical moiety on the surface of a ubiquitin ligase, creating a composite binding interface between drug and ligase that recruits the target protein. This mirrors how antibody CDRs — just a few diversified amino acids on a conserved IgG scaffold — achieve high specificity. Recognizing this analogy helps chemists design glues by focusing diversification on the small presented chemical group rather than the whole molecule.
  • Academic-industry hybrid structure preserves discovery breadth: The Center for Protein Degradation at Dana-Farber, funded by Deerfield Management at $80M in 2018, was structured as a separate team inside the institution rather than a standalone biotech. This preserved open communication between academic and translational work, allowed technology advancement that small biotechs cannot resource, and enabled spinning out companies like Neomorph only after achieving sufficient mechanistic clarity — avoiding the premature focus pressure that comes with early-stage venture timelines.

What It Covers

Eric Fischer, structural biologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, explains how targeted protein degraders and molecular glues work as a new drug class, tracing the field from thalidomide's rediscovered mechanism through the 2014 breakthrough papers, the $80M Deerfield-Dana-Farber Center for Protein Degradation, and spinout companies including Neomorph now partnered with Novartis, Biogen, and AbbVie.

Key Questions Answered

  • Thalidomide as clinical proof of concept: The 2014 discovery that thalidomide and lenalidomide work by binding ubiquitin ligase cereblon and degrading transcription factors IKZF1 and IKZF3 provided overnight clinical validation for an entirely new drug class. Millions of multiple myeloma patients were already safely taking these drugs, eliminating the need to prove the mechanism could work in humans — a shortcut that compressed years off the field's development timeline.
  • Molecular glues vs. PROTACs — size determines tractability: PROTACs use two warheads connected by a linker, often exceeding 1,000 daltons, creating challenges with solubility, permeability, and plasma protein binding that complicate dose prediction. Molecular glues like thalidomide, at roughly 260 daltons, face none of those barriers. When selecting a degrader modality, smaller targets with no existing binding pocket favor molecular glues; well-characterized targets with known binders are more compatible with PROTAC approaches.
  • Mass spectrometry cataloging to unlock molecular glue targets: Because molecular glues lack predictable design rules, Fischer's lab uses mass spectrometry to systematically identify which proteins become susceptible to degradation when glue derivatives are modified. Diversifying the chemical scaffold and mapping resulting target shifts builds a catalog researchers can then optimize against a specific disease target — converting a historically serendipitous process into a structured, repeatable discovery workflow.
  • Composite protein surface mimics antibody CDR logic: Molecular glues work by presenting a small chemical moiety on the surface of a ubiquitin ligase, creating a composite binding interface between drug and ligase that recruits the target protein. This mirrors how antibody CDRs — just a few diversified amino acids on a conserved IgG scaffold — achieve high specificity. Recognizing this analogy helps chemists design glues by focusing diversification on the small presented chemical group rather than the whole molecule.
  • Academic-industry hybrid structure preserves discovery breadth: The Center for Protein Degradation at Dana-Farber, funded by Deerfield Management at $80M in 2018, was structured as a separate team inside the institution rather than a standalone biotech. This preserved open communication between academic and translational work, allowed technology advancement that small biotechs cannot resource, and enabled spinning out companies like Neomorph only after achieving sufficient mechanistic clarity — avoiding the premature focus pressure that comes with early-stage venture timelines.
  • Target selection criteria for spinout viability: Fischer applies three filters before committing a project to a startup: a strong biological rationale that a specific target drives disease and that degrading it would shift clinical outcomes measurably within the first few dozen patients; a clear, tractable chemistry path to a drug-like molecule; and an honest assessment of whether the team and setting are genuinely best positioned to execute. Projects where trials require pharma-scale resources are routed to large company partnerships rather than biotech formation.

Notable Moment

Fischer describes how Novartis scientists working alongside him in Basel broadly believed targeted protein degradation would never produce viable drugs — concerns centered on both chemistry feasibility and unpredictable toxicity. The thalidomide mechanism discovery reversed that consensus almost instantly by providing real-world human safety and efficacy data that no preclinical model could have supplied.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

Episode Transcript

Welcome to the long run. This is a podcast for biotech adventurers. I'm your host, Luke Timmerman. Today's guest is Eric Fisher. Eric is a professor at Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. His structural biology and chemical biology expertise has led him down a path to become one of the world's experts in a new category of medicine that includes targeted protein degraders and molecular glues. These novel chemical entities can be made to interact with disease targets inside cells that traditional molecules, small molecules and genetically engineered biologics haven't been effective against. This is an exciting new frontier emerging at the nexus of structural biology, chemical biology, and drug discovery. Eric was one of the key scientists along with Nathaniel Gray, who were tapped to lead a center for protein degradation at Dana Farber with $80,000,000 from Deerfield Management, an investment firm back in 2018. Some of this research has now led to startup activity. Now before we get started, a word from the sponsor of the long run, Dash Bio. Are you tired of inconsistent bioanalysis results and waiting months for data that should take days? Dash is the only bioanalysis CRO built from the ground up with a tech first approach designed to deliver better, faster, and cheaper than anyone else. With DASH, you get faster turnaround with results in days, not months, high quality data across major assay types, including ELISA MSD, LCMS, and PCR, supporting all modalities and therapeutic areas, customer first policies like guaranteed outcomes and transparent pricing. And from preclinical to late stage studies, DASH helps you move from assay development and validation to sample analysis with unmatched speed. Founded by industry veterans who felt the pain of traditional CROs, DASH is the partner researchers and clinical leaders actually need, reliable, fast, and easy to work with. So if slow bioanalysis CROs are costing you money and missed deadlines, put Dash to the test. Visit www.-.bio and see how fast bioanalysis can be. Now please enjoy this conversation with Eric Fisher on the long run. Eric Fisher, welcome to the long run. Thank you. I'm really excited to talk with you today about all things targeted protein degradation. I think this is an exciting new, class of medicines, in the pipeline that I I think everybody in the pharmaceutical industry knows about, but maybe not in the wider world. And so this is just gonna be a good opportunity for, learning about, like, the the expanding universe of possibilities in medicine. Yeah. I I totally agree with that. It's it's been an exciting journey the last ten years, not only with targeted protein degradation, but generally, I think, the creativity that has created all these new approaches to treating treating disease is is quite astounding, and I think target protein degradation is one of them. We have all, obviously, the CRISPR and gene editing technologies, all the things with biologics and engineering of bispecifics, multispecifics. I think it's it's getting a big …

Get the full transcript (10,445 words) + summary by email — free

One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.

One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.

Browse all The Long Run with Luke Timmerman transcripts →

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 62-minute episode.

Get The Long Run with Luke Timmerman summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

More from The Long Run with Luke Timmerman

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

Explore Related Topics

This podcast is featured in Best Biotech Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

Read this week's Startups & Product Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.

You're clearly into The Long Run with Luke Timmerman.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from The Long Run with Luke Timmerman and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime