Skip to main content
a16z Podcast

Workday’s Last Workday? AI and the Future of Enterprise Software

29 min episode · 2 min read
·

Episode

29 min

Read time

2 min

Topics

Artificial Intelligence, Software Development

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Platform shift timing: Enterprise software incumbents get displaced during technology transitions, not between them. Workday beat PeopleSoft by rebuilding for cloud in 2005. AI now creates the same window — the first moment a CHRO or CIO can be shown a fundamentally different system architecture, not just a point solution layered on top of existing infrastructure.
  • Brownfield over Greenfield: Startups like Gusto pursue Greenfield customers not yet locked into enterprise platforms. The AI-era opportunity is Brownfield — targeting existing Workday customers who have 97% retention not from satisfaction but from switching costs. Enterprises report willingness to replace Workday if a feature-equivalent, AI-native alternative existed and could be deployed in 30–60 days.
  • Deployment compression as unlock: Legacy enterprise HR implementations take 12-plus months and significant consulting spend. AI-native coding and migration tooling can compress deployment to 30–60 days. This timeline reduction is the structural prerequisite for rip-and-replace to become viable — without it, switching costs remain prohibitive regardless of product quality or pricing advantages.
  • AI revenue skepticism: Workday reports $400M AI ARR growing triple digits, but Schmidt characterizes this as procurement innovation rather than genuine product transformation. Flex credits still require $25,000 licensing fees plus consultants to build anything. No agentic experiences are actually deployed inside customer Workday instances — enterprises are spending AI budgets without receiving AI-native functionality.
  • Agent permissioning as next battleground: As companies deploy more AI agents, those agents need role-based permissions and tracking tied to HR data — the same data Workday holds. CIOs are already asking how to manage agent permissioning at scale. An AI-native HR system becomes the identity and permissions layer for the entire agentic enterprise, expanding its strategic value well beyond payroll and benefits.

What It Covers

a16z partner Joe Schmidt argues that Workday — a 20-year-old HR platform with 97% gross dollar retention — faces its first genuine displacement threat from AI-native competitors. The same platform shift logic that let Workday unseat PeopleSoft in 2005 now applies against Workday itself, across HR, CRM, and ITSM categories.

Key Questions Answered

  • Platform shift timing: Enterprise software incumbents get displaced during technology transitions, not between them. Workday beat PeopleSoft by rebuilding for cloud in 2005. AI now creates the same window — the first moment a CHRO or CIO can be shown a fundamentally different system architecture, not just a point solution layered on top of existing infrastructure.
  • Brownfield over Greenfield: Startups like Gusto pursue Greenfield customers not yet locked into enterprise platforms. The AI-era opportunity is Brownfield — targeting existing Workday customers who have 97% retention not from satisfaction but from switching costs. Enterprises report willingness to replace Workday if a feature-equivalent, AI-native alternative existed and could be deployed in 30–60 days.
  • Deployment compression as unlock: Legacy enterprise HR implementations take 12-plus months and significant consulting spend. AI-native coding and migration tooling can compress deployment to 30–60 days. This timeline reduction is the structural prerequisite for rip-and-replace to become viable — without it, switching costs remain prohibitive regardless of product quality or pricing advantages.
  • AI revenue skepticism: Workday reports $400M AI ARR growing triple digits, but Schmidt characterizes this as procurement innovation rather than genuine product transformation. Flex credits still require $25,000 licensing fees plus consultants to build anything. No agentic experiences are actually deployed inside customer Workday instances — enterprises are spending AI budgets without receiving AI-native functionality.
  • Agent permissioning as next battleground: As companies deploy more AI agents, those agents need role-based permissions and tracking tied to HR data — the same data Workday holds. CIOs are already asking how to manage agent permissioning at scale. An AI-native HR system becomes the identity and permissions layer for the entire agentic enterprise, expanding its strategic value well beyond payroll and benefits.

Notable Moment

Schmidt reveals he logged into Workday only three times in the past year despite being an a16z employee, and spent six and a half minutes locating his own compensation data. He used this personal experience as evidence that the core user experience has not meaningfully changed since 2005.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 26-minute episode.

Get a16z Podcast summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

More from a16z Podcast

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

Explore Related Topics

This podcast is featured in Best Business Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

Read this week's AI & Machine Learning Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.

You're clearly into a16z Podcast.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from a16z Podcast and 192+ other podcasts. Free for up to 3 shows.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime