BACK TO THE FUTURE

What It Covers

Jim Grant and Steve Bogdan analyze America's declining defense industrial capacity versus China's shipbuilding dominance, exploring implications for capital markets, interest rates, and the shift from intangible to tangible capital investment amid rising geopolitical tensions.

Key Questions Answered

• •Defense Industrial Atrophy: US shipyards service fewer than 200 vessels versus China's 7,000-plus capacity, with 40% of American submarine fleet currently out of service due to deferred maintenance and workforce shortages, creating strategic vulnerability requiring outsourcing to Japanese and Korean shipbuilders.
• •Capital Investment Reversal: Tangible investment share of GDP declined from 12.5% to 8.5% between 1985-2021 while intangibles rose, but this trend reverses as AI data centers, electrical grid expansion, and remilitarization demand massive physical infrastructure spending, pressuring interest rates upward despite Federal Reserve cuts.
• •Fiscal Deficit Collision: Running 6.4% peacetime deficit with defense spending likely increasing to 5% of GDP creates unsustainable trajectory where annual interest expense reaches $1.1 trillion at 3.3% average rates, while lowest yield curve rate sits at 4.1%, guaranteeing accelerating debt service costs.
• •Munitions Production Gap: US used 80 Tomahawk missiles in single day against Houthis but only purchased 55 annually, illustrating critical stockpile depletion and production capacity constraints that require years of skilled labor development and capital investment to address, favoring prime defense contractors.