Episode 313: The Spontaneous Eruption of Now
Episode
75 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Psychology & Behavior, Philosophy & Wisdom, Science & Discovery
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Neuroscience Misinterpretation: The viral claim that scientists measured qualia by showing 35 participants colors in fMRI scanners only demonstrated similar brain activation patterns across subjects viewing identical stimuli, completely missing the hard problem of consciousness regarding subjective experience itself.
- ✓Idealist Philosophy Foundation: Berkeley's idealism argues external objects need not exist independently of perception since the universe need not create two versions of reality. Hume extended this by denying the self exists beyond bundles of perceptions, yet both philosophers retained belief in temporal succession.
- ✓Identity of Indiscernibles: Leibniz's principle states if two moments share identical properties in every way, they must be the same moment. Borges applies this to argue that repeated experiences across time collapse temporal distinctions, suggesting moments exist autonomously without causal connection.
- ✓Present Moment Absoluteness: Buddhist philosophy and Schopenhauer's work suggest only the present exists as reality. Past and future exist solely as mental constructs within current consciousness, making temporal succession an unnecessary metaphysical assumption that can be eliminated through philosophical parsimony.
- ✓Subjective Time Distortion: Personal experiences of time vary dramatically from objective measurements. Waiting thirty seconds at a microwave feels eternal while hours pass quickly in engaging activities, suggesting consciousness imports temporal structure rather than tracking objective time reliably across different mental states.
What It Covers
Philosopher Tamler Sommers and psychologist Dave Pizarro critique a viral physics video claiming scientists measured qualia, then explore Jorge Luis Borges' essay arguing time itself is an illusion through idealist philosophy.
Key Questions Answered
- •Neuroscience Misinterpretation: The viral claim that scientists measured qualia by showing 35 participants colors in fMRI scanners only demonstrated similar brain activation patterns across subjects viewing identical stimuli, completely missing the hard problem of consciousness regarding subjective experience itself.
- •Idealist Philosophy Foundation: Berkeley's idealism argues external objects need not exist independently of perception since the universe need not create two versions of reality. Hume extended this by denying the self exists beyond bundles of perceptions, yet both philosophers retained belief in temporal succession.
- •Identity of Indiscernibles: Leibniz's principle states if two moments share identical properties in every way, they must be the same moment. Borges applies this to argue that repeated experiences across time collapse temporal distinctions, suggesting moments exist autonomously without causal connection.
- •Present Moment Absoluteness: Buddhist philosophy and Schopenhauer's work suggest only the present exists as reality. Past and future exist solely as mental constructs within current consciousness, making temporal succession an unnecessary metaphysical assumption that can be eliminated through philosophical parsimony.
- •Subjective Time Distortion: Personal experiences of time vary dramatically from objective measurements. Waiting thirty seconds at a microwave feels eternal while hours pass quickly in engaging activities, suggesting consciousness imports temporal structure rather than tracking objective time reliably across different mental states.
Notable Moment
Borges concludes his time refutation by acknowledging these philosophical arguments serve as secret consolations against mortality. Despite intellectual exercises denying temporal succession, he admits the world remains real and he remains himself, aging and consumed by the very time he attempted to refute.
Episode Transcript
Very Bad Wizards is a podcast with a philosopher, my dad, and psychologist, Dave Fesaro, having an informal discussion about issues in science and ethics. Please note that the discussion contains bad words that I'm not allowed to say, and knowing my dad, some very inappropriate jokes. They say time is the fire. Maiden, I'm Who are you? Who are you? A very bad man. I'm a very good man. Good man. They think they've lost and with no more brains than you have. Pay no attention to that man. Anybody can have a brain? You're a very bad man. I'm a very good man. Just a very bad wizard. Welcome to Very Bad Wizards. I'm Tamara Summers from the University of Houston. Dave Pour went out for The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which was canceled yesterday or two days ago or whatever. It's all an illusion anyway. Did you watch a single second of Colbert's show while it was on the air? I don't think so. Maybe maybe, like, Nikki pointed her phone at me just to, like, show me a segment for a second. But no. No. I'm not missing out on anything. No. No. I don't I don't think I watched a single second of it. Like, not even, like, a clip of it. Did you used to watch the old one, like, on whatever? Oh, yeah. Like, after John Stewart. Or whatever. Yeah. Exactly. No. I never really like like, I didn't love that shtick, but, like, I could see why other people might, but it just wasn't. It's it was not it's not my style of humor. Right. I like the guy more than Jon Stewart. Like, I found Jon Stewart to be a little too smug for my tastes, and there was something a little disarming about his character, Stephen Colbert, the the the dimwitted, slightly conservative pundit, that he played. Yeah. But Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I think you had to, like, actually feel some affection for Yeah. The character if you were gonna like it. But, really, what I'm what I care about is if they come for Stephen Colbert, they're gonna come for us. That's what I'm worried about too. Yeah. We're next. Clearly. America's eyes are all on us. Yeah. Like, the Trump administration is going, like, one down, one to go. They're going through Patreon. They're, like, requesting subpoenaed Patreon. Q and As are gonna be all part of the public record now. Well, I stand by every single thing that we've said Yeah. Except, like, anything I probably said about, like, moral psychology in the first three years. You're just about. Yeah. Well, see, you've dissed science, and what you didn't know is its power to solve philosophical problems. That's right. And so in the first segment, we're gonna be talking about, a new study or a video that is describing a study that measured qualia. The thing that our stupid philosophers thought you couldn't do, well, they …
Get the full transcript (12,914 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 72-minute episode.
Get Very Bad Wizards summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Very Bad Wizards
Episode 329: Why We Suffer
Mar 31 · 80 min
The Jordan Harbinger Show
1364: Dr. Max Butterfield | Challenging Viral Dating Myths with Science
Aug 4
More from Very Bad Wizards
Episode 328: Weapons Free
Mar 17 · 102 min
This Week in Startups
Why F1 Teams are Replacing Wind Tunnels with Smart Tape | E2305
Jun 27
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links.
other
by Jorge Luis Borges
“philosopher Tamler Sommers and psychologist Dave Pizarro critique a viral physics video claiming scientists measured qualia, then explore Jorge Luis Borges' essay arguing time itself is an illusion through idealist philosophy”
More from Very Bad Wizards
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
Episode 329: Why We Suffer
Episode 328: Weapons Free
Episode 327: You Ain't So Smart (Flannery O'Connor's "Good Country People")
Episode 326: The Most Important Episode of Your (Academic) Life
Episode 325: It Is Happening Again
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
The Jordan Harbinger Show
Aug 4
1364: Dr. Max Butterfield | Challenging Viral Dating Myths with Science
This Week in Startups
Jun 27
Why F1 Teams are Replacing Wind Tunnels with Smart Tape | E2305
Hidden Brain
Mar 9
Yuck! The Science of Disgust
Deep Questions with Cal Newport
Feb 23
Ep. 393: Can Movies Save Us From Our Phones?
The Money Guy Show
Feb 9
Financial Advisors React to CRAZY Money Advice
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best Philosophy Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
You're clearly into Very Bad Wizards.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Very Bad Wizards and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime