AI Trends 2026: OpenClaw Agents, Reasoning LLMs, and More with Sebastian Raschka - #762
Episode
78 min
Read time
3 min
Topics
Productivity, Investing, Startups
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Post-training vs. pre-training R&D shift: Research teams are now concentrating resources on post-training techniques rather than pre-training because low-hanging fruit remains in reinforcement learning and reasoning pipelines. Pre-training is already highly optimized — more data and better data mixes yield diminishing returns — while post-training algorithms like GRPO still have significant room for improvement through relatively accessible algorithmic tweaks.
- ✓Verifiable rewards as the reasoning engine: DeepSeek R1's breakthrough relied on training models using math and code problems where correctness can be verified deterministically — using tools like SymPy for symbolic math comparison or code compilers. This eliminates the need for human evaluators, enabling generation and scoring of tens of thousands of answers cheaply. Extending verifiable rewards to domains like drug design or protein structure modeling is the next frontier.
- ✓Inference-time scaling via self-consistency and self-refinement: Two concrete techniques boost model accuracy without retraining. Self-consistency generates multiple answers at varied temperatures and selects via majority vote (best-of-N). Self-refinement feeds a model's output back to itself or another model with a rubric, prompting iterative correction. DeepSeek Math 3.2 demonstrated that cranking up both techniques enabled gold-level competition math performance from the same base model.
- ✓LLMs as tool-builders, not just task-doers: The highest-leverage use of LLMs for technical users is building deterministic workflow tools — native apps, scripts, custom web tools — rather than using LLMs for every task directly. Raschka built macOS apps for podcast chapter-mark insertion and metadata extraction from arXiv links. Charrington built a podcast analytics pipeline. Using LLMs to create deterministic tools avoids hallucination risk on repetitive structured tasks.
- ✓Agentic systems require model fine-tuning for multi-agent environments: Current agentic tools like OpenClaw and Claude Code use standard LLMs not specifically trained for multi-agent interaction. OpenAI's Codex backend is a fork of GPT-5.3 fine-tuned specifically for agentic coding tasks. Raschka predicts major labs will fine-tune dedicated agent models for multi-agent settings, similar to how Codex diverged from the base model, improving reliability in looped, tool-using pipelines.
What It Covers
Sebastian Raschka, independent LLM researcher, joins Sam Charrington to assess the LLM landscape in early 2026. They cover reasoning model advances, inference-time scaling techniques, the rise of agentic tools like OpenClaw, practical workflow automation using LLMs, and what to expect from post-training research through the rest of 2026.
Key Questions Answered
- •Post-training vs. pre-training R&D shift: Research teams are now concentrating resources on post-training techniques rather than pre-training because low-hanging fruit remains in reinforcement learning and reasoning pipelines. Pre-training is already highly optimized — more data and better data mixes yield diminishing returns — while post-training algorithms like GRPO still have significant room for improvement through relatively accessible algorithmic tweaks.
- •Verifiable rewards as the reasoning engine: DeepSeek R1's breakthrough relied on training models using math and code problems where correctness can be verified deterministically — using tools like SymPy for symbolic math comparison or code compilers. This eliminates the need for human evaluators, enabling generation and scoring of tens of thousands of answers cheaply. Extending verifiable rewards to domains like drug design or protein structure modeling is the next frontier.
- •Inference-time scaling via self-consistency and self-refinement: Two concrete techniques boost model accuracy without retraining. Self-consistency generates multiple answers at varied temperatures and selects via majority vote (best-of-N). Self-refinement feeds a model's output back to itself or another model with a rubric, prompting iterative correction. DeepSeek Math 3.2 demonstrated that cranking up both techniques enabled gold-level competition math performance from the same base model.
- •LLMs as tool-builders, not just task-doers: The highest-leverage use of LLMs for technical users is building deterministic workflow tools — native apps, scripts, custom web tools — rather than using LLMs for every task directly. Raschka built macOS apps for podcast chapter-mark insertion and metadata extraction from arXiv links. Charrington built a podcast analytics pipeline. Using LLMs to create deterministic tools avoids hallucination risk on repetitive structured tasks.
- •Agentic systems require model fine-tuning for multi-agent environments: Current agentic tools like OpenClaw and Claude Code use standard LLMs not specifically trained for multi-agent interaction. OpenAI's Codex backend is a fork of GPT-5.3 fine-tuned specifically for agentic coding tasks. Raschka predicts major labs will fine-tune dedicated agent models for multi-agent settings, similar to how Codex diverged from the base model, improving reliability in looped, tool-using pipelines.
- •Mixture-of-experts and multi-head latent attention define 2025-2026 architecture trends: DeepSeek V3's architecture — combining mixture-of-experts with multi-head latent attention (MLA) — became the dominant template, adopted by Kimi (scaled to 1 trillion parameters) and Mistral AI. MLA compresses key-value cache via low-rank projection (similar to LoRA), trading compute for memory efficiency. DeepSeek's sparse attention mechanism further reduces quadratic scaling costs, making these the practical production-proven architectural choices to watch.
Notable Moment
Raschka recounts attempting to add a dark mode to his personal website using an LLM, only to find that manually editing the CSS file himself was faster than iteratively prompting the model to reposition a misaligned button — illustrating that retained technical knowledge still outperforms LLM delegation on precise, structured tasks.
Episode Transcript
The r and d, like, the research and development of the focus of the research team, I I think it's more focused nowadays on the post training, like, getting more performance out of that because it's more like the newer paradigm and there are still low hanging fruits to be picked. Where in pre training, it's already pretty sophisticated. You will still get better results if you use more data, optimize the data mix, maybe, multi token prediction and these types of things. But most of the interesting things are happening now on the post training front and the reasoning realm. So I I think we will see more there. Alright, everyone. Welcome to another episode of the TwinWell AI podcast. I am your host, Sam Cherrington. Today, I'm joined by Sebastian Raschka. Sebastian is an independent LLM researcher. Before we get going, be sure to take a moment to hit that subscribe button wherever you're listening to today's show. Sebastian, welcome back to the podcast. It's been a little bit. Yeah. Thank you for inviting me back, Sam. I'm happy to, yeah, be back and to chat about LLMs, AI, and whatever you have in mind. I had a lot of fun last time, so I hope we can make it fun and interesting again. You know, my joke around this time, it's getting a bit old, but it's like, the last time we spoke was three years ago. Not much has changed. Right? Well, all all good things come in threes, I think. There's a saying. Right? And in fact, a ton has changed, and we're gonna be focusing on the most recent and most important of those changes in particular, what's new with LLMs and what to expect with LLMs in 2026. This is an area that you spend a lot of time focusing on with your research and education work. You know, maybe we can start with just, you know, kind of top of mind. Like, if you think about, you know, very big picture where we are now compared to where we were a year ago, you know, what what, is your broad reflection about the evolution of the space? Look at, today compared to one year ago, it's almost like the anniversary of, DeepSeq, the big DeepSeq version three model accompanied by the r one model, the reasoning. I would say, reasoning revolution in quotation marks. It's still LLMs. It's, still the same base model, but we have now more techniques on top of that to make the models smarter in terms of, solving more complex problems. And, the so I would say architecture wise, our LLM architectures are looking still relatively similar, but the reasoning training is one of the new things if we compare today to last year. And then also, I think there's a more heavy focus on tool use. So back then, when ChatGPD was launched or also the first, iteration of LLMs, the focus was mainly on, general purpose …
Get the full transcript (13,421 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 75-minute episode.
Get The TWIML AI Podcast summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from The TWIML AI Podcast
World Models and the Future of Spatial AI with Justin Johnson - #775
Sep 1 · 66 min
Odd Lots
Grace Shao on What the World Should Know About Chinese AI
Jun 22
More from The TWIML AI Podcast
Why the Next AI Breakthrough May Come from Physics with Max Welling - #774
Aug 25 · 55 min
Modern Wisdom
The Masculinity Debate Is A Huge Mess - Richard Reeves - #1087
Apr 20
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links.
Tools
“Current agentic tools like OpenClaw and Claude Code use standard LLMs not specifically trained for multi-agent interaction.”
“DeepSeek R1's breakthrough relied on training models using math and code problems where correctness can be verified deterministically — using tools like SymPy for symbolic math comparison or code compilers.”
by Anthropic
“Current agentic tools like OpenClaw and Claude Code use standard LLMs not specifically trained for multi-agent interaction.”
More from The TWIML AI Podcast
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
World Models and the Future of Spatial AI with Justin Johnson - #775
Why the Next AI Breakthrough May Come from Physics with Max Welling - #774
Why Image Generation Needs More Than Bigger Models with Fatih Porikli - #773
Why Models Are AI’s Next Training Dataset with Damian Borth - #772
How AI Learns to Smell with Alex Wiltschko - #771
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
Odd Lots
Jun 22
Grace Shao on What the World Should Know About Chinese AI
Modern Wisdom
Apr 20
The Masculinity Debate Is A Huge Mess - Richard Reeves - #1087
Lex Fridman Podcast
Feb 1
#490 – State of AI in 2026: LLMs, Coding, Scaling Laws, China, Agents, GPUs, AGI
Biotech Bulls & Breakthroughs
Aug 1
Biopharma Industry: Insights from BioSpace Senior Editor Annalee Armstrong
The Joe Rogan Experience
Sep 9
#2551 - Daniel Kokotajlo
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best AI Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
Read this week's Investing & Markets Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.
You're clearly into The TWIML AI Podcast.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from The TWIML AI Podcast and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime