Skip to main content
Freakonomics Radio

675. Has the New York Times Become a Games Company?

57 min episode · 2 min read
·
Eric Zimmerman

Episode

57 min

Read time

2 min

Topics

Productivity, Fundraising & VC, Design & UX

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Subscription-first pivot: The New York Times shifted from an ad-first, print-first model in 2015, growing from roughly 1 million digital subscribers to nearly 13 million, targeting 15 million by 2027. Games function as an entry point — users arrive via Wordle or the Mini crossword, then migrate into news, cooking, and sports content within the bundle.
  • Game retention metrics: NYT Games evaluates new titles using Day 1, Day 7, and Day 30 retention rates as primary success indicators, not total minutes played. Connections maintains low solve rates yet high retention because unsolved puzzles still feel rewarding enough to drive return visits — demonstrating that frustration and satisfaction can coexist productively in puzzle design.
  • Wordle acquisition model: Josh Wardle built Wordle for friends, added shareable green-and-gray emoji results as a viral mechanic, and reached 300,000 users before the Times published a news article about it on January 3, 2022. The Times acquired it weeks later for a reported low seven figures, gaining tens of millions of new users — an unusually clean product fit requiring minimal redesign.
  • Human-made content advantage: NYT Games deliberately avoids AI-generated puzzles, citing consumer ability to detect machine-made content. AI models reportedly still cannot reliably solve Connections due to its misdirection mechanics. The human editorial layer — including a dedicated word curator selecting each daily Wordle — creates perceived prestige: players feel they are outsmarting New York Times staff, not an algorithm.
  • Game design philosophy over gamification: Designer Eric Zimmerman distinguishes meaningful game design from gamification, which extracts surface elements like points and badges while discarding genuine play. NYT Games applies this by rejecting paid streak preservation, avoiding aggressive session-length targets, and building Cross Play with a post-game review feature powered by an AI bot to help players improve rather than simply extend engagement time.

What It Covers

Freakonomics Radio examines how the New York Times transformed its business model through games, tracing the acquisition of Wordle for low seven figures, the growth to nearly 13 million subscribers, and 11.2 billion annual puzzle plays, while game designer Eric Zimmerman contextualizes gaming within a broader cultural and philosophical framework.

Key Questions Answered

  • Subscription-first pivot: The New York Times shifted from an ad-first, print-first model in 2015, growing from roughly 1 million digital subscribers to nearly 13 million, targeting 15 million by 2027. Games function as an entry point — users arrive via Wordle or the Mini crossword, then migrate into news, cooking, and sports content within the bundle.
  • Game retention metrics: NYT Games evaluates new titles using Day 1, Day 7, and Day 30 retention rates as primary success indicators, not total minutes played. Connections maintains low solve rates yet high retention because unsolved puzzles still feel rewarding enough to drive return visits — demonstrating that frustration and satisfaction can coexist productively in puzzle design.
  • Wordle acquisition model: Josh Wardle built Wordle for friends, added shareable green-and-gray emoji results as a viral mechanic, and reached 300,000 users before the Times published a news article about it on January 3, 2022. The Times acquired it weeks later for a reported low seven figures, gaining tens of millions of new users — an unusually clean product fit requiring minimal redesign.
  • Human-made content advantage: NYT Games deliberately avoids AI-generated puzzles, citing consumer ability to detect machine-made content. AI models reportedly still cannot reliably solve Connections due to its misdirection mechanics. The human editorial layer — including a dedicated word curator selecting each daily Wordle — creates perceived prestige: players feel they are outsmarting New York Times staff, not an algorithm.
  • Game design philosophy over gamification: Designer Eric Zimmerman distinguishes meaningful game design from gamification, which extracts surface elements like points and badges while discarding genuine play. NYT Games applies this by rejecting paid streak preservation, avoiding aggressive session-length targets, and building Cross Play with a post-game review feature powered by an AI bot to help players improve rather than simply extend engagement time.

Notable Moment

The New York Times editorial board condemned crossword puzzles in 1924 as a sinful waste comparable to the mahjong craze — yet the paper launched its own crossword just eleven days after Pearl Harbor, framing it as a public mental health necessity. The same institution now logs 11.2 billion annual puzzle plays.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

Episode Transcript

Save now at Whole Foods Market. It's the summer splash event with great everyday prices on three sixty five brand ground beef for the grill and ice cream for dessert. They have yellow sales signs on ready to cook beef or chicken kebabs too. Level up with savory marinades, spices, and rubs, and complete your cookout with a crowd pleasing cherry pie and their balsamic chicken salad available at the prepared foods counter. Get summer splash savings now at Whole Foods Market. It's smart to always have a few financial goals. And a really smart one you can set? Earning cash back on what you buy every day. And with Discover, you can. Get this. Discover automatically matches all the cashback you've earned at the end of your first year. Seriously, all of it. And we trust you to make smart decisions. After all, you listen to this show. See terms@discover.comslashcreditcard. Okay. I've got a riddle for you. Name something that we all do as children, something that's considered good and important. But when we do it as adults, it's often looked down on. Got it? Okay. What's your answer? That's right. The answer is play. Social scientists have generated a lot of evidence that playing is good for us. According to one widely cited study, play contributes to the cognitive, physical, social, and emotional well-being of children. The playing of games is thought to be especially valuable. And why is that? In 1978, the Canadian philosopher Bernard Suits published a sly and influential little book called The Grasshopper Games, Life, and Utopia. In which he defined game playing as the voluntary attempt to overcome unnecessary obstacles. Which to me at least could sound like a definition of life itself. In both life and games there are constraints. Some of them artificial. There is luck and uncertainty. There's limited information. There are trade offs between risk and reward and also pressure which tends to scramble our decision making. There's also the fact that over time we have invented so many types of games for so many types of players and they serve so many different functions. Games can be a connection, a laboratory, an escape, almost anything, really. And you can see it in the numbers. According to the American Time Use survey, playing games is our number two leisure activity. Number one is watching TV, and a lot of what we watch is live sports, which are, yes, games. So today on Freakonomics Radio, the first of what we hope will be a recurring series on the joys, the perils, and the absurdity of games. Within minutes, there were strangers eight and ten deep on each other's laps. In this episode, we will hear about game design, and we will ask if The New York Times is becoming a games company. The New York Times is not becoming a games company. What we play, why we play, and what it does for us, all that starts now. This is …

Get the full transcript (10,652 words) + summary by email — free

One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.

One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.

Browse all Freakonomics Radio transcripts →

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 54-minute episode.

Get Freakonomics Radio summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode

SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links. As an Amazon Associate, SignalCast earns from qualifying purchases.

Products

  • by Drip Drop

    SPONSORS: Drip Drop
  • The New York Times shifted from an ad-first, print-first model in 2015, growing from roughly 1 million digital subscribers to nearly 13 million, targeting 15 million by 2027. Games function as an entry point — users arrive via Wordle or the Mini crossword.
  • by New York Times

    Connections maintains low solve rates yet high retention because unsolved puzzles still feel rewarding enough to drive return visits — demonstrating that frustration and satisfaction can coexist productively in puzzle design.
  • by New York Times

    NYT Games applies this by rejecting paid streak preservation, avoiding aggressive session-length targets, and building Cross Play with a post-game review feature powered by an AI bot to help players improve.

More from Freakonomics Radio

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

Explore Related Topics

This podcast is featured in Best Finance Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

You're clearly into Freakonomics Radio.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Freakonomics Radio and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime