Prediction markets want to be the news

Support for the show comes from Anthropic, the team behind Claude. You know how sometimes a problem just grabs you? Like, you sit down thinking it's a quick thing, then suddenly it's midnight. That's exactly the kind of mind Claude is built for. People who don't just want the answer, they wanna chase the thing that's underneath it. Anthropic positions Claude as a thinking partner, not a search engine. It works through the problem with you, and it doesn't try to just wrap things up in an easy answer. Get started with Claude for free at claud.ai/decoder. Adobe Acrobat Studio, your team's home base collaborate within a shared PDF space. You've got your docs, your plans, your specs, and then invite the crew to build what's next. They talk off the team words. They think that this design could be a contender. When somebody wonders, what's the next step? AI Vanta uses AI and automation to get you compliant fast, simplify your audit process, and unblock deals so you can prove to customers that you take security seriously. You can think of Vanta as your always on AI powered security expert who scales with you. That's why top startups like Cursor, Linear, and Replit use Vanta to get and stay secure. Get started at vanta.com/vox. That's vanta.com/vox. Vanta.com/vox. Hello, and welcome to Decoder. I'm Eli Patel, editor in chief of The Verge, and Decoder is my show about big ideas and other problems. Today, let's talk about prediction markets, which continue to insert themselves into the news cycle and the news in increasingly weird, unsettling, and potentially illegal ways. My guest today is Liz Lupato, a senior reporter here at The Verge who owns what we cheerfully call the chaos beat. Liz has been writing a lot about prediction markets lately, and especially why they all seem so intent on being perceived as sources of news. A position which directly incentivizes insider trading, which in turn creates a long list of very predictable problems. For example, this past weekend after The United States and Israel went to war with Iran, leading prediction market platforms, Kalshi and Polymarket, erupted with activity. That included extremely contentious markets around the death of Iran's supreme leader, and some that appear to be rife with insider trading from people with advanced knowledge of US military actions. That's right. In 2026, you can, from the comfort of your couch, wager on when The United States will bomb a foreign country. And for Kalshi and Pali market, that's quite literally the business model, betting on anything. Right now, sports is where they make most of their money, which is why both companies are in the crosshairs of so many state gambling authorities. But this industry thinks of itself as something far grander. Prediction market players want to be the news, and they've devised new, frankly, unconvincing frameworks for why they should be considered legitimate sources of information instead of just anything goes casinos. Kalshi's tagline is trade …