Skip to main content
RW

Rachel Wiseman

2episodes
1podcast

We have 2 summarized appearances for Rachel Wiseman so far. Browse all podcasts to discover more episodes.

Featured On 1 Podcast

All Appearances

2 episodes
In Our Time

Elizabeth Anscombe

In Our Time
55 minSenior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Liverpool

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Elizabeth Anscombe transformed twentieth century moral philosophy by challenging consequentialism, establishing philosophy of action as a distinct field, and reviving Aristotelian virtue ethics through her groundbreaking 1957 book Intention and influential essay Modern Moral Philosophy. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Doctrine of Double Effect:** Anscombe distinguished between intended consequences and merely foreseen ones in moral action. Truman intended civilian deaths at Hiroshima as means to end war, making it murder, not collateral damage from targeting military infrastructure with foreseeable civilian casualties. - **Intention Through Description:** Actions carry multiple descriptions simultaneously. A person pumping water moves their arm, operates machinery, and replenishes supply. Intentionality depends on which descriptions the actor endorses when asked why, revealing nested purposes connected by in order to relationships between bodily movements and aims. - **Why Question Method:** Anscombe reveals intentional action patterns by examining when the question why applies. If someone answers with reasons rather than I did not know I was doing that, the action counts as intentional under that description, creating a formal pattern independent of mental states. - **Consequentialism Critique:** Anscombe coined consequentialism to describe the view holding people equally responsible for all action consequences regardless of intention versus foresight. She argued modern moral philosophy wrongly stripped concepts like moral obligation from their Judeo-Christian context, rendering them meaningless in secular frameworks. → NOTABLE MOMENT In 1956, Anscombe publicly opposed Oxford awarding Harry Truman an honorary degree, calling him a mass murderer for bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Her protest received international newspaper coverage and letters of gratitude from bomb survivors, though Oxford proceeded with the award. 💼 SPONSORS None detected 🏷️ Virtue Ethics, Philosophy of Action, Moral Philosophy, Wittgenstein

In Our Time

Philippa Foot

In Our Time
58 minReader in Philosophy at the University of Liverpool

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Philippa Foot (1920-2010) challenged mid-century moral subjectivism by developing virtue ethics grounded in Aristotelian naturalism, arguing that human flourishing requires virtues as objectively as plants need water to thrive. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Fact-Value Distinction:** Foot dismantled A.J. Ayer's claim that moral judgments merely express subjective approval by analyzing words like "rude" and "dangerous" that inherently blend factual description with evaluative content, showing values cannot be cleanly separated from facts. - **Trolley Problem Framework:** Foot distinguished morally between allowing one to die while saving five versus actively killing one to save five, arguing the critical difference lies in initiating new causal sequences through interference rather than merely redirecting existing threats. - **Natural Goodness Theory:** Humans need virtues (justice, courage, temperance) to flourish based on species-specific life form requirements—social cooperation, child-rearing dependencies, vulnerability in old age—making moral defects analogous to physical defects in other living organisms like weak-rooted oak trees. - **Virtue as Corrective:** Each virtue addresses specific human weaknesses where we naturally fail—temperance counters excessive pleasure-seeking, courage counters cowardice—making virtues objectively necessary dispositions of will rather than arbitrary cultural preferences or subjective choices about how to live. → NOTABLE MOMENT Foot stood before the American Philosophical Association and declared that understanding morality sometimes requires thinking about plants, using oak tree root systems to illustrate how living things have objective standards of flourishing that apply equally to human virtue. 💼 SPONSORS None detected 🏷️ Virtue Ethics, Moral Philosophy, Aristotelian Naturalism, Trolley Problem

Never miss Rachel Wiseman's insights

Subscribe to get AI-powered summaries of Rachel Wiseman's podcast appearances delivered to your inbox weekly.

Start Free Today

No credit card required • Free tier available