Skip to main content
MR

Megan Reitz

2episodes
2podcasts

We have 2 summarized appearances for Megan Reitz so far. Browse all podcasts to discover more episodes.

Featured On 2 Podcasts

All Appearances

2 episodes
Think Fast Talk Smart: Communication Techniques

259. Quick Thinks: Task-Focused to People-Focused—A Smarter Way to Communicate

Think Fast Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
22 minAssociate Fellow at University of Oxford SAID Business School and Adjunct Professor of Leadership and Dialogue at Hult International Business School

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Megan Reitz, associate fellow at University of Oxford SAID Business School, explains her research on spaciousness in workplace communication. She contrasts doing mode versus spacious mode attention, explores how chronic busyness prevents psychological safety, and provides methods for leaders and team members to create environments where difficult conversations can happen. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Doing Mode vs Spacious Mode:** Organizations operate in two attention modes. Doing mode focuses narrowly on goals, targets, and short-term control with instrumental thinking. Spacious mode enables expansive, unhurried attention that generates insight, creativity, and relationship building. The doing mode has overtaken most organizational conversations, suffocating discussions about purpose, learning, and meaningful connection. Teams need both modes but currently over-index on task-focused doing. - **Busyness as Cultural Barrier:** The most common excuse preventing psychological safety development is people saying they are too busy. After a decade of organizational research, this pattern emerges consistently. When teams operate exclusively in doing mode, they cannot pause to create environments for speaking up and being heard. Teaching psychological safety techniques becomes pointless if people remain trapped in pathological busyness without capacity to shift attention modes. - **Superiority Illusion in Listening:** Research surveying 24,000 employees globally reveals a clear pattern where people consistently rate their own listening skills generously while judging others harshly. This occurs because individuals assess themselves on intent to listen but evaluate others on observable behavior. This gap prevents improvement in psychological safety because people fail to recognize their actual listening deficits and their impact on silencing voices around them. - **Response Determines Speaking Up Culture:** When people speak up with challenging ideas, they often do so clumsily or imperfectly. Leaders frequently respond in ways that completely shut down future contributions rather than appreciating the courage required. These moments represent intelligent failures that require learning and reflection. How leaders respond to imperfect speaking up attempts determines whether team members will risk vulnerability again or remain silent permanently. - **How You Show Up Affects Others' Voices:** Individual presence within any system directly impacts whether people around them feel able to speak. This applies regardless of hierarchy position in workplace, family, or community settings. Rather than trying to fix silent people, organizations should focus on helping everyone recognize their impact on others. Building this awareness and capacity for self-reflection creates conditions where psychological safety can develop organically through changed behavior patterns. → NOTABLE MOMENT Reitz challenges the common misunderstanding that psychological safety means being nice, polite, and comfortable. She argues that truly psychologically safe environments enable difficult conversations necessary for flourishing, which can feel far from comfortable. When organizations appear very polite and agreeable, they likely lack genuine psychological safety because people avoid necessary challenges and honest feedback. 💼 SPONSORS [{"name": "Babbel", "url": "https://babbel.com/tfts"}, {"name": "Strawberry.me", "url": "https://strawberry.me/smart"}] 🏷️ Psychological Safety, Leadership Communication, Workplace Culture, Organizational Behavior, Mindful Communication

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Brené Brown interviews professors Megan Reitz and John Higgins about their research on employee activism in organizations, exploring their six-category taxonomy of organizational responses and the ACTIF framework for navigating activism dynamics. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Six Response Categories:** Organizations respond to employee activism through six patterns: nonexistent (leaders unaware activism exists), suppression (silencing voices overtly or covertly), facadeism (making statements without action), defensive engagement (minimum legal compliance), dialogic engagement (collective decision-making with employees), and stimulating activism (organizational identity as activist). - **The Optimism Bubble:** Senior leaders consistently overestimate how much employees speak up and underestimate unspoken challenges. Junior employees rate organizational openness significantly lower than executives do, creating dangerous blind spots where leaders believe dialogue exists while employees experience suppression, preventing necessary organizational change. - **Speaking Up is Relational:** Employee voice depends entirely on how leaders show up. One research participant reported that after someone spoke up, they disappeared from the organization. Leaders must interrogate their own reactions to activism before responding, as their comfort level directly determines whether employees can find their voice. - **ACTIF Framework Components:** Authority (power distribution and whether leaders use power-over or power-with approaches), Concern (what matters to stakeholders without assuming you know), Theory of change (whether organizations exist independent of society or as part of it), Identity (rule-maker versus rule-taker), Field (global and local events influencing organizational agenda). - **Direct Manager Impact:** The single strongest predictor of whether employees feel heard is their direct line manager relationship, not CEO statements or company policies. Managers determine daily whether people contribute ideas, raise problems, or stay with the organization, making every team leader responsible for creating speak-up cultures. → NOTABLE MOMENT A senior global executive participated in an advantage blindness exercise, stepping forward for each unearned advantage. He ended far ahead of colleagues. Six months later, he called the facilitator to say it was the most shameful experience, realizing his success stemmed partly from systemic advantages. 💼 SPONSORS [{"name": "Thumbtack", "url": "thumbtack.com"}, {"name": "Odoo", "url": "odoo.com"}, {"name": "Stitch Fix", "url": "stitchfix.com"}] 🏷️ Employee Activism, Organizational Power Dynamics, Leadership Communication, Workplace Voice, Diversity and Inclusion

Never miss Megan Reitz's insights

Subscribe to get AI-powered summaries of Megan Reitz's podcast appearances delivered to your inbox weekly.

Start Free Today

No credit card required • Free tier available