Skip to main content
AH

Angie Hobbs

Professor of the Public Understanding of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield. Expert on ancient Greek philosophy, particularly Plato. Regular media contributor on philosophy and ethics.

5episodes
1podcast

Featured On 1 Podcast

All Appearances

5 episodes
In Our Time

The Muses

In Our Time
45 minProfessor of Public Understanding of Philosophy at University of Sheffield

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS The Muses in Greek mythology trace their evolution from divine inspirers of poetry and creativity through Homer and Hesiod to Plato's philosophical reinterpretation, examining their role in memory, artistic creation, and cultural authority. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Divine Authorization:** Hesiod describes meeting the Muses on Mount Helicon around 700 BC, where they breathed divine voice into him and declared their power to speak truth or convincing falsehoods, establishing poets' authority through divine connection rather than personal skill. - **Memory as Foundation:** The Muses are daughters of Mnemosyne (Memory) and Zeus, making memory central to creativity. Ancient bards memorized all 24 books of Iliad and Odyssey, demonstrating how cultural transmission in oral societies depended on mnemonic capacity enabled by divine inspiration. - **Plato's Hierarchy Shift:** In the Ion dialogue, Plato reframes poets as passive, irrational vessels in magnetic chains of influence, placing philosophers above poets as true servants of the Muses, fundamentally challenging earlier views of poets as active, skilled creators with divine partnership. - **Gender and Creation:** The Muses remain exclusively female across traditions, possibly reflecting ancient Greek views linking creation to childbirth, with male poets requiring feminine divine midwifery to produce their works, though the Muses themselves wielded active power to grant or revoke creative gifts. → NOTABLE MOMENT The scholar Thamyris challenged the Muses to a singing contest and was punished with blindness and loss of musical ability, illustrating how claiming equality with divine powers constituted fatal hubris in Greek culture, a cautionary tale depicted widely on vases and in Sophocles' lost play. 💼 SPONSORS [{"name": "Wren Technology", "url": "reninc.com"}] 🏷️ Greek Mythology, Ancient Poetry, Creative Inspiration, Classical Philosophy

In Our Time

Marcus Aurelius

In Our Time
53 minProfessor of Public Understanding of Philosophy, University of Sheffield

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Marcus Aurelius ruled Rome from 161-180 CE as the last of five good emperors. His Meditations, written in Greek during military campaigns, reveal Stoic philosophy applied to imperial power and personal virtue. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Stoic Self-Control:** Marcus practiced radical acceptance that virtue and happiness depend only on internal rational control, not external circumstances like war, plague, or political turmoil. This allowed him to maintain equilibrium despite lacking control over empire-wide crises. - **Daily Reflection Practice:** Marcus wrote brief philosophical reminders each evening to dye his thoughts with Stoic principles, similar to keeping a commonplace book. This repetitive writing reinforced virtues like accepting fate, avoiding anger, and focusing only on the present moment's duties. - **Tension Between Philosophy and Power:** Despite Stoic ideals of simplicity and universal brotherhood, Marcus led brutal military campaigns, oversaw Christian persecutions, and maintained imperial hierarchy. His meditations reveal constant struggle to reconcile philosophical principles with practical governance demands and personal revulsion toward court life. - **Grief Management Through Detachment:** Following Epictetus, Marcus advocated reminding oneself nightly that children might die tomorrow as part of divine providence. This extreme Stoic position reflects his trauma from losing most of his thirteen children and attempts to preemptively control grief through rational acceptance. → NOTABLE MOMENT Marcus warns himself not to become Caesarified or dipped in purple dye, revealing his awareness that absolute power corrupts and his conscious effort to resist the seductions of imperial privilege through philosophical self-discipline. 💼 SPONSORS [{"name": "Heartland Credit Union", "url": "heartlandcu.com"}] 🏷️ Roman Philosophy, Stoicism, Ancient Leadership, Imperial History

In Our Time

Plato's Atlantis

In Our Time
54 minProfessor of Public Understanding of Philosophy at the University of Sheffield

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Plato's Atlantis story from the Timaeus and Critias serves as a philosophical thought experiment contrasting virtuous, land-based prehistoric Athens with the wealthy, imperialistic maritime empire of Atlantis to explore ideal governance and warn against imperialism. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Narrative Unreliability:** Plato deliberately undermines credibility through Critias, Athens' most radical anti-democrat who led the Thirty Tyrants coup. The nine-link transmission chain from Egyptian priests through Solon spans impossible timescales, forcing readers to actively philosophize rather than passively accept the tale. - **Sea Power Critique:** Atlantis represents Periclean Athens' thalassocracy (sea-based democracy) ruled by working-class sailors from Piraeus, while prehistoric Athens mirrors Sparta's land-based military structure. Plato argues maritime imperialism breeds corruption, whereas modest land powers maintain virtue through limited resources and stable populations. - **Missing Philosopher Kings:** Unlike the Republic's ideal state governed by philosopher rulers, prehistoric Athens operates under military leadership alone. This deliberate omission by narrator Critias reveals Plato's concern that even well-structured states fail without philosophical wisdom guiding political power. - **Anti-Imperial Warning:** Written around 360 BCE as Athens rebuilt maritime ambitions and Macedonia rose northward, the story warns that excessive wealth-seeking and territorial expansion destroy existing prosperity. Both virtuous Athens and corrupt Atlantis perish, demonstrating that human vice invites divine punishment regardless of military success. → NOTABLE MOMENT The Egyptian priest tells Solon that Greeks are perpetual children with no ancient knowledge or written records, yet Plato uses this dismissal of Greek credibility to authorize his entirely fabricated nine-thousand-year-old story about Athenian supremacy. 💼 SPONSORS [{"name": "Pandora Jewelry", "url": "pandora.net"}, {"name": "BBC Audio Dramatizations", "url": null}, {"name": "Coca Cola", "url": null}] 🏷️ Ancient Philosophy, Political Theory, Atlantis Mythology, Greek History

In Our Time

Plato's Gorgias

In Our Time
50 minProfessor of Public Understanding of Philosophy, University of Sheffield

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Plato's Gorgias dialogue examines rhetoric versus philosophy through Socrates debating Gorgias, Polus, and Callicles about power, justice, and whether it's better to suffer or commit injustice in ancient Athens. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Rhetoric as flattery:** Socrates argues rhetoric is a knack like cosmetics or cookery, not an art requiring knowledge. It aims at pleasure and gratification rather than truth or the audience's genuine good, making it potentially dangerous when misused in democratic institutions. - **Justice and self-interest:** Socrates demonstrates that wrongdoing harms one's own soul more than being wronged by others. The best course after committing injustice is seeking punishment to cleanse the soul, making rhetoric's proper use advocating for one's own correction. - **Conversational ethics:** How people speak reveals character. Extended rhetorical speechmaking shows domination and power-seeking, while Socratic dialogue through short question-and-answer embodies equality, reciprocity, and collaborative truth-seeking without domination, establishing friendship and community between participants. - **Might versus right:** Callicles claims natural law favors the strong dominating the weak, that conventional morality is a conspiracy of the weak. Plato shows this anti-democratic sentiment breeds tyranny, warning that misused rhetoric in democracy creates conditions for tyrants to emerge. → NOTABLE MOMENT Socrates claims he alone practices true politics because his questioning method serves citizens by improving them through examination rather than currying favor for personal power, making philosophy the authentic political art despite appearing powerless. 💼 SPONSORS None detected 🏷️ Ancient Philosophy, Political Theory, Rhetorical Theory, Ethics

In Our Time

Socrates in Prison

In Our Time
51 minProfessor of Public Understanding of Philosophy, University of Sheffield

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Plato's Crito and Phaedo recount Socrates' final days in prison, where he refuses escape, defends obedience to Athenian law, argues for the soul's immortality, and dies calmly by hemlock in 399 BCE. → KEY INSIGHTS - **Legal obligation theory:** Socrates presents two foundational arguments for political obedience: the benefit argument (citizens owe obedience for goods received) and implicit contract theory (remaining in Athens constitutes agreement to obey its laws, establishing consent through action not words). - **Soul-body dualism:** Philosophy serves as preparation for death by disentangling the soul from bodily concerns during life. Socrates argues the soul is essentially alive and deathless, therefore indestructible, though ancient readers including Cicero found these arguments unconvincing despite wanting to believe them. - **Philosophical method over conclusions:** Socrates maintains open inquiry until his final breath, inviting challenges and admitting potential errors in his immortality arguments. He seeks agreement through rational reflection rather than persuasion, demonstrating that how one conducts philosophical investigation matters as much as conclusions reached. - **Civil disobedience paradox:** Socrates refuses to obey a hypothetical law banning philosophy but accepts execution under unjust conviction. This tension between individual conscience and legal authority creates debate about whether he models submission to law or principled resistance, influencing political philosophy for millennia. → NOTABLE MOMENT Socrates' final words request a cock be sacrificed to Asclepius, the healing god, reframing his death as medicine curing the sickness of embodied life rather than poison ending it, transforming execution into philosophical liberation. 💼 SPONSORS None detected 🏷️ Ancient Philosophy, Political Obligation, Soul Immortality, Socratic Method

Never miss Angie Hobbs's insights

Subscribe to get AI-powered summaries of Angie Hobbs's podcast appearances delivered to your inbox weekly.

Start Free Today

No credit card required • Free tier available