How the Civil War changed how we vote
Episode
16 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Science & Discovery, Economics & Policy, History
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Soldier Enfranchisement: In 1861, only one U.S. state legally permitted soldiers to vote in the field. By 1864, mounting Republican political pressure drove multiple states to pass new statutes creating absentee ballot systems and proxy voting specifically to capture the Union Army's vote.
- ✓Electoral Math and Party Strategy: Lincoln's party chairman warned him he would lose Illinois, Indiana, and Pennsylvania — enough to cost the election. Republicans actively pushed soldier voting rights after recognizing that Union Army loyalty ran roughly 3-to-1 in Lincoln's favor, making enfranchisement a direct strategic advantage.
- ✓Fraud Vulnerabilities in Early Absentee Voting: The new voting mechanisms introduced exploitable weaknesses: imposters could act as proxies, commanding officers could intimidate voters, and sealed soldier ballots could be opened and swapped. Both parties accused each other of manipulation, including forged ballots targeting New York state's outcome.
- ✓Wartime Elections as Democratic Proof of Concept: Lincoln framed the 1864 election as evidence that representative government could survive internal crisis. Holding a legitimate national election mid-civil war was historically unprecedented, and the process directly laid groundwork for expanded voting rights in subsequent decades.
What It Covers
The 1864 U.S. presidential election, held during the Civil War, forced states to pioneer absentee and proxy voting systems for roughly one million Union soldiers, reshaping American electoral infrastructure and confirming democracy's resilience under wartime conditions.
Key Questions Answered
- •Soldier Enfranchisement: In 1861, only one U.S. state legally permitted soldiers to vote in the field. By 1864, mounting Republican political pressure drove multiple states to pass new statutes creating absentee ballot systems and proxy voting specifically to capture the Union Army's vote.
- •Electoral Math and Party Strategy: Lincoln's party chairman warned him he would lose Illinois, Indiana, and Pennsylvania — enough to cost the election. Republicans actively pushed soldier voting rights after recognizing that Union Army loyalty ran roughly 3-to-1 in Lincoln's favor, making enfranchisement a direct strategic advantage.
- •Fraud Vulnerabilities in Early Absentee Voting: The new voting mechanisms introduced exploitable weaknesses: imposters could act as proxies, commanding officers could intimidate voters, and sealed soldier ballots could be opened and swapped. Both parties accused each other of manipulation, including forged ballots targeting New York state's outcome.
- •Wartime Elections as Democratic Proof of Concept: Lincoln framed the 1864 election as evidence that representative government could survive internal crisis. Holding a legitimate national election mid-civil war was historically unprecedented, and the process directly laid groundwork for expanded voting rights in subsequent decades.
Notable Moment
Confederate leaders were confident that Northern war fatigue would hand the presidency to Democrat George McClellan, who planned to end the war immediately and abandon emancipation entirely — making the soldier vote the decisive factor preventing that outcome.
Episode Transcript
This message comes from Mint Mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch at mintmobile.com/switch. $45 upfront payment for three months. Five gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month. Taxes and fees extra. First three months only. See terms. This is America in Pursuit, a limited run series from THROUGHLINE and NPR. I'm Ramtin Arablouei. Each week, we bring you stories about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in The U. S. That began two hundred fifty years ago this year. Today, we're going back to one of the most significant moments in U. S. History, the Civil War, one of the bloodiest wars fought on American soil. At the heart of the war was the question of slavery and whether to abolish it. The Confederate South broke off from the Union because it wanted to keep slavery and the freedom to govern themselves. The Union in the North, led by President Abraham Lincoln, wanted to make slavery illegal and keep The United States together. A little less than two years into the bloody conflict, on 01/01/1863, President Lincoln made a bold proclamation. All persons held as slaves within any state or designated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against The United States, shall be then, thenceforward and forever free. The Emancipation Proclamation was a major flex in federal power. Lincoln spells out new terms of peace. The fighting would only end when slavery ended. This was a risky move because the Union was gearing up for a presidential election, and not everyone in the Union agreed with Lincoln's hard line views on abolition and how to fight the war. He's aware that by insisting on making emancipation a condition of peace negotiations with the Confederacy, he's giving political ammunition to the Democrats. The Democrats, the opposition are saying, you're deliberately protracting the war to secure abolition. You could get peace, if only you were prepared to think about reuniting the country on the constitution as it once was, not on what you want it to be. So there was a lot at stake here. The election of eighteen sixty four is, in my view, the most significant election in American history, the most significant for democracy in American history. The election would take place in the middle of the war. It would test the young republic's ability to hold an election in times of duress and shape the outcome of the war. Today on this show, Rund and I bring you the story of how the eighteen sixty four election changed how we vote and who we are as a country. That's coming up after a quick break. This message comes from Wise, the app for international people using money around the globe. You can send, spend, and receive in up to 40 currencies with only a few simple taps. Be smart. Get wise. Download the Wise app today or visit wise.com. T's and c's apply. This message comes from Mint …
Get the full transcript (2,595 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 13-minute episode.
Get Throughline summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Throughline
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
The Daily (NYT)
Sep 9
Trump’s War on Mail-In Voting
Everything Everywhere Daily
Sep 2
Watergate
The Jordan Harbinger Show
Aug 21
1371: Showed Intent to Roam, so In-Laws Stole Home | Feedback Friday
Stuff You Should Know
Jul 9
Eleanor Roosevelt: Best First Lady
Everything Everywhere Daily
Jun 22
The 1984-85 Ethiopian Famine
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best History Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
You're clearly into Throughline.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Throughline and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime