PREMIUM-Ep. 378: Aquinas on God and Mind (Part Four)

Picture this. You're on a date, and then bad breath happens. Confidence gone. Here's the truth. Most gums and mints are just bad breath band aids, but not Zelleman's minty mouth. The functional breath freshener you swallow, tiny dual action capsules with mint on the outside, parsley seed oil inside, clinically tested to fight the toughest offenders, even garlic and onions. It's only available online. Go to zellman's.com, zelmins, zellman's.com, code fresh for 15% off. Okay. Only 10 more presents to wrap. You're almost at the finish line. But first there. The last one. Enjoy a Coca Cola for a pause that refreshes. You're about to hear a preview of Partially Examined Life supporter exclusive content. To learn how to get the whole thing, check out partiallyexaminedlife.com/support. Hey. You're listening to Partially Examined Life. It's still episode 378, the fourth part of it, the supporter only part. Thank you for supporting. Just to finish the thing that we're originally assigned for our 378 recording which was a week ago today. But we still have this section left on feelings. That is section 15 in the Thomas Aquinas selective philosophical writings from Timothy McDermott. Can we review a little bit from last time? Do we have an overall model of the mind? I mean, I know we talked about whether it's passive or active, and that's gonna be relevant for feelings which are passive. That's passio. They're defined as passive, being affected by something. But do we have any thicker model of the mind here? Well, there's a form of passivity to the mind that does not involve loss. He wants to say that the mind has this kind of general relationship to objects such that they can actualize its potential, which I think is important. I think it has kind of an analog in neuroscience. Right? For every experience we have, we get certain changes in the brain and the way synapses are related to each other. But it's interesting that for any possible experience, there is a brain state that could be had to encode that experience, or at least I suppose that's true. So that's a way of getting at the kind of universal flexibility of of the mind. Anything that and here, I guess, we're talking about thought specifically. Anything that can be conceptualized, the mind can do that. But there's an active way in which the mind is involved, and I think the brain science gets at that. But despite the fact that there's an activity to the brain, that activity is somehow a passivity. It's a receptiveness and openness to the world. Isn't it also the case though that there's a structure in the brain that mirrors to some extent I don't wanna use the word intentionality because that doesn't happen for another thousand years or something. But part of what mind does is actualize potentialities, immaterial potentialities. The mind has objects in the same way that the senses have objects. It's directed. It's also …