Ep. 377: Emil Cioran's Pessimism (Part Two)

Picture this. You're on a date, and then bad breath happens. Confidence gone. Here's the truth. Most gums and mints are just bad breath band aids, but not Zelleman's minty mouth. The functional breath freshener you swallow, tiny dual action capsules with mint on the outside, parsley seed oil inside, clinically tested to fight the toughest offenders, even garlic and onions. It's only available online. Go to zellman's.com, zelmins, zellman's.com, code fresh for 15% off. Okay. Only 10 more presents to wrap. You're almost at the finish line. But first there. The last one. Enjoy a Coca Cola for a pause that refreshes. You're listening to the Partially Examined Life episode 377 part two. We've been discussing Emile Turan's 1949 book, A Short History of Decay. We were sort of getting down to brass tacks of what is this awfulness that is the thing that we keep trying to escape from, the thing that we keep throwing ourselves in Kierkegaardian fashion in various strategies, into work, into ideals, into pretend salvation. Yeah. Wes, did you wanna recap what you were just saying when we stopped there? Well, I was emphasizing this idea that we that there's something ineffable inside us, something mysterious that can't be communicated to others. So that inevitably we are in solitude. And I think he might say, although I don't know that he explicitly says it, but a lot of what we're doing with these absolutes or these flying into religion or science or philosophy, anything like that in a way. We're trying to, deny this essential solitude and essential in communicability. Ability. Right? So he he's not a fan of words, for instance. Except maybe in poetry. But, yeah. Yeah. And this notion of nothingness or there being sort of an ineffable source that we're naming, but there's always the source that is closer to the real world. Right? I immediately think of Hegel. Right? And Hegel, I guess in the end, it's this iterative process that you're trying to ultimately get to comprehend it. Right? But there's still always a source. And I guess we could pick any number of other philosophers in which there is this fundamental nothingness because it hasn't been named yet that ends up being the source. Is the concrete. Right? That it is reminiscent of Hegel. So the in the graveyard of definitions on page seven. It's very reminiscent of the Hegel in the sense, the the inadequacy of definitions to concrete things. They always. So he'll say, the idle empty mind, which joins the world only by the grace of sleep, can practice only by extending the name of things, by emptying them and substituting formulas for them. Then it maneuvers over their debris. No more sensations. Nothing but memories. So we get away from the real, from this world of, you know, immediate sensation by using words and by using concepts that this idea that we can we join the world only in sleep is really interesting. …