Ep. 376: Plato's "Laws" (Part Two)

Picture this. You're on a date, and then bad breath happens. Confidence gone. Here's the truth. Most gums and mints are just bad breath band aids, but not Zelleman's minty mouth. The functional breath freshener you swallow, tiny dual action capsules with mint on the outside, parsley seed oil inside, clinically tested to fight the toughest offenders, even garlic and onions. It's only available online. Go to zellman's.com, zelmins, zellman's.com, code fresh for 15% off. Okay. Only 10 more presents to wrap. You're almost at the finish line. But first there. The last one. Enjoy a Coca Cola for a pause that refreshes. You're listening to the parsley examine life episode three seventy six part two, we've been discussing Plato's a lengthy dialogue, the laws we had discussed earlier books. That's jump to our selection from books four and five, where we set up what the laws should well, maybe, Seth, you should start us because you were like, why are we reading book four? At some point when you got into it, because it does eventually get a lot around to, oh, there are preludes to the laws. That's the point. But it there seems to be some things before that. Mhmm. What I did finally was just make a note that says, you can convince people to follow the laws either by persuasion or by compulsion. And that's the rest of it is kind of like window dressing around that. So essentially, the Athenian stranger introduces the idea that laws should have these preludes, and the preludes are supposed to be persuasive. And persuasive, going back to how when we were talking about, you know, the regular doctor and the slave doctor or whatever, like, it's treating your patient as if they're part of the process or simply telling them what to do and punishing them if they don't. And so I think that question that to you? Your doctor punishes you? I think it's your body that punishes you. Yeah. He yells at you. You're gonna die. You're gonna have a heart attack. Yeah. So, you know, I think the thinking in terms of the republic, the question would be, well, why do you have to persuade you know, why would you wanna persuade or have to persuade anybody anyway? Why not just put out the laws and say, this is what needs to be done and the law giver does that and then people and it goes back to what we were talking about, the purpose of the state and creating a virtuous citizenry and a participatory citizenry as opposed to one that's simply obedient. So I gather that there's a lot of interesting conversations to be had about how this contrasts to the republic and but that's kind of what it boiled down to for me, and I didn't feel like I had a huge need to to delve too much more deeply into it. I'm happy to be scolded and upbraided, persuaded and compelled, …