Ep. 371: Christine Korsgaard on Normativity (Part Two)

Ever see an idea so clearly in your head, but struggle to make it real? We've all been there. With Wix, you can build a website for your business just the way you pictured it. Get the best of both worlds with AI and drag and drop tools all in one place. Stay Stay in your creative flow and use AI when you want, how you want. Create a website your way. Try it out at wix.com. Picture this. You're on a date and then bad breath happens. Confidence gone. Here's the truth. Most gums and mints are just bad breath band aids, but not Zelleman's minty mouth. The functional breath freshener you swallow, tiny dual action capsules with mint on the outside, parsley seed oil inside, clinically tested to fight the toughest offenders, clinically tested to fight the toughest offenders, even garlic and onions. It's only available online. Go to zelmins.com, zelmins, zelmans.com, code fresh for 15% off. You're listening to the Partially Examined Life episode 371 part two, finishing up our treatment of Christine Korsgaard's The Sources of Normativity. We're in the maybe three point two point four, so we're still in the third lecture there, around page 99 where she's explicating Kant and trying to really make Kant you know, it's like she's teaching us as we're undergrads, and she's trying to teach us basic Kant and not just give us here's the formula to remember, but I want you to understand, like, why this is actually true. I wanna really pitch this to you in a very direct way. And so if I want to make decisions at all and make them in a way that seems free to me, then I need to have my will be ruled by a law. Any law, but just a law. So this seems like a very peculiar thing. It just means I need to have reasons. Someone's gotta be the ruler. Right? Otherwise, you're just just reacting It's either gonna be heteronomy. Right? Yep. It's gonna be Mhmm. Objects ruling you, you responding just by impulse to objects, or it's gonna be a ruler. It's gonna be a king or this or that. So we have to find somewhere where the buck stops. The ruler is where the buck stops. The regrowth stops. And there's only one way to do that without ending up enslaved to some external principle, and that's to make use of a law that we produce ourselves. And that's what autonomy means. Right? So it's nomos is law, and the autonomy just means the law comes from us. And it's a it's, yeah, it's a little clever workaround. It's like a little loophole in the system where we think we might, okay, maybe we can be free after all. It's not that we can be free of all constraints. Of course, we can't. We can't be free of causal laws And reasoning, of course, we're kind of bound to reasons if we're reasoning. So …