AQR’s Antti Ilmanen – US Exceptionalism: Growth Story or Valuation Trap? | #607
Episode
63 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Productivity, Investing, Fundraising & VC
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Valuation vs Growth Attribution: Post-GFC US equity outperformance came primarily from valuation expansion (CAPE rising from average to 40x) rather than earnings growth, with richening contributing more than the actual 1% historical US earnings growth advantage over international markets. This pattern typically reverses over subsequent decades.
- ✓US Relative Valuation Extreme: US CAPE ratio now trades at 1.8x non-US developed markets, near the December 2021 peak of 2.0x. Historical data shows this ratio has 85% predictive power (r-squared) for ten-year forward returns when measured from 1985 onward, suggesting significant mean reversion risk ahead.
- ✓Objective vs Subjective Expectations: Yield-based objective measures show 0.5 positive correlation with future returns, while rear-view-mirror subjective expectations (analyst forecasts, retail sentiment) show negative 0.3 correlation. Institutions follow objective models on paper but often deviate in practice, staying overweight US despite low expected returns.
- ✓Bond vs Equity Investor Psychology: Bond investors demonstrate contrarian mean-reversion behavior because they quote forward-looking yields, while equity investors extrapolate past performance because they focus on backward-looking prices and returns. This fundamental difference in framing drives opposite forecasting patterns across asset classes.
- ✓Diversifier Implementation Strategy: Portable alpha and return-stacking approaches that combine equity beta exposure through derivatives with diversifying strategies (trend-following, multi-factor) prove more durable than standalone diversifiers. This structure prevents investors from abandoning diversifiers during extended equity bull markets when line-item comparison looks unfavorable.
What It Covers
Antti Ilmanen from AQR examines US market valuations at 40x CAPE ratio, contrasts objective yield-based forecasts with subjective rear-view-mirror expectations, and explains why current US equity premiums appear unsustainably thin for the decade ahead.
Key Questions Answered
- •Valuation vs Growth Attribution: Post-GFC US equity outperformance came primarily from valuation expansion (CAPE rising from average to 40x) rather than earnings growth, with richening contributing more than the actual 1% historical US earnings growth advantage over international markets. This pattern typically reverses over subsequent decades.
- •US Relative Valuation Extreme: US CAPE ratio now trades at 1.8x non-US developed markets, near the December 2021 peak of 2.0x. Historical data shows this ratio has 85% predictive power (r-squared) for ten-year forward returns when measured from 1985 onward, suggesting significant mean reversion risk ahead.
- •Objective vs Subjective Expectations: Yield-based objective measures show 0.5 positive correlation with future returns, while rear-view-mirror subjective expectations (analyst forecasts, retail sentiment) show negative 0.3 correlation. Institutions follow objective models on paper but often deviate in practice, staying overweight US despite low expected returns.
- •Bond vs Equity Investor Psychology: Bond investors demonstrate contrarian mean-reversion behavior because they quote forward-looking yields, while equity investors extrapolate past performance because they focus on backward-looking prices and returns. This fundamental difference in framing drives opposite forecasting patterns across asset classes.
- •Diversifier Implementation Strategy: Portable alpha and return-stacking approaches that combine equity beta exposure through derivatives with diversifying strategies (trend-following, multi-factor) prove more durable than standalone diversifiers. This structure prevents investors from abandoning diversifiers during extended equity bull markets when line-item comparison looks unfavorable.
Notable Moment
Ilmanen reveals he stayed entirely out of equities throughout the 1990s bull market due to high valuations, missing substantial gains. His office mate later challenged whether he believed more in his timing models than in the equity premium itself, fundamentally reshaping his approach to position sizing.
Episode Transcript
Welcome to the Meb Faber show, where the focus is on helping you grow and preserve your wealth. Join us as we discuss the craft of investing and uncover new and profitable ideas, all to help you grow wealthier and wiser. Better investing starts here. Matt Faber is the cofounder and chief investment officer at Cambria Investment Management. Due to industry regulations, he will not discuss any of Cambria's funds on this podcast. All opinions expressed by podcast participants are solely their own opinions and do not the opinion of Cambria Investment Management or its affiliates. For more information, visit cambriainvestments.com. Today's show is sponsored by Cambria. Do you hold legacy investment positions with significant gains? What if you could transition into an ETF without facing a large tax bill? You can with the three fifty one ETF exchange. Here's how it works. Investors contribute stocks or other securities to a newly formed ETF in exchange for ETF shares. As long as the special rules and diversification requirements are met, the investor is essentially able to seed the launch of the ETF without an immediate taxable event. Because ETFs typically don't distribute any capital gains, investors don't face taxes until they sell their ETF shares, allowing for better control over the timing of the tax event. Are you ready to explore a three fifty one ETF exchange? Visit cambriafunds.com forward slash three fifty one to take the next step in innovative, tax savvy investing with Cambria today. Cambria Investment Management l p, Cambria is a registered investment adviser. Information set forth herein is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial investment, tax, or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments are subject to risk, including the risk of loss of principal. Welcome back, everybody. Today, we have one of my all time favorite guests back on the show. We're joined by Antti Ullmanen, global co head of the portfolio solutions group at AQR. Capital management in this role, he managed the team responsible for advising institutional investors, sovereign wealth funds. That means big money, y'all. Develops the firm's broad investing ideas. He has a new series of papers this year. I'd like to call it a book almost. They're almost expect about expected returns. We're gonna cover them all today. Antti, welcome back to the show. Thanks. Great to be back, Meb. And, Antti, it may even convert into a book next year. There's some talk with CFA Institute. Yeah. Well, I wanted to ask you a question. You know, when you join AQR, is the first week do they say, look. Here's the deal. We gotta make sure you do a class in footnotes because the AQR papers always have the best footnotes. And I actually tweeted one last night that there was a quote that you put in near the end of the first paper. And I'm gonna read it listeners because it was so good. You can tell me why you …
Get the full transcript (11,193 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 60-minute episode.
Get The Meb Faber Show summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from The Meb Faber Show
Why Gold Stopped Being a Commodity (AllianceBernstein’s Inigo Fraser Jenkins) | #649
Sep 4 · 50 min
Odd Lots
The Big Macro Force That's Been Driving Stocks Higher for Years
Apr 11
More from The Meb Faber Show
Paul Kedrosky: AI is the First Bubble With Every Ingredient at Once | #648
Aug 28 · 45 min
Decoder
Prediction markets want to be the news
Mar 5
More from The Meb Faber Show
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
Why Gold Stopped Being a Commodity (AllianceBernstein’s Inigo Fraser Jenkins) | #649
Paul Kedrosky: AI is the First Bubble With Every Ingredient at Once | #648
Jerry Parker on Big Game Hunting in the Market | #647
David Booth: 45 Years to $1 Trillion at Dimensional | #646
Luke Gromen: The Bull Market That Loses You Money | #645
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
Odd Lots
Apr 11
The Big Macro Force That's Been Driving Stocks Higher for Years
Decoder
Mar 5
Prediction markets want to be the news
SaaStr Podcast
Feb 25
SaaStr 843: Software Stocks Have Massively Crashed. Here's What Founders Need to Know.
Marketplace
Feb 16
What if Trump does roll back steel and aluminum tariffs?
The Bulwark Podcast
Feb 13
Scott Galloway: Time to Send a Message to the CEOs
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best Investing Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
Read this week's Investing & Markets Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.
You're clearly into The Meb Faber Show.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from The Meb Faber Show and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime