“You’re…fired?” A momentous Supreme Court case

You know what's wild? Most people are still overpaying for car insurance just because it's a pain to switch. That's why there's Jerry. Jerry's the only app that compares rates from over 50 insurance in minutes and helps you switch fast with no spam calls or hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over $1,300 a year. Before you renew your car insurance policy, do yourself a favor. Download the Jerry app or head to jerry.ai/acast. AI is transforming customer service. It's real and it works. And with Fin, we've built the number one AI agent for customer service. We're seeing lots of cases where it's solving up to 90% of real queries for real businesses. This includes the real world complex stuff like issuing a refund or canceling an order. And we also see it when Fin goes up against competitors. It's top of all the performance benchmarks, top of the g two leaderboard. And if you're not happy, we'll refund you up to a million dollars, which I think says it all. Check it out for yourself at fin.ai. The Economist. Hello, and Astronomers often put their telescopes in space so that turbulence in the Earth's atmosphere doesn't blur their clear vision. But the growing number of man made objects in orbit are obscuring their view. And the digital era is coming for the makers of some seriously analog technology, the pen. Big manufacturers are laying off pen making staff left and right, except at one cutesy Italian firm. First up though. Let's talk about the case of an American president with a sweeping economic plan who disagrees with someone from the Federal Trade Commission, someone who's from the rival party. The president fires that someone. The legality of the firing is questioned. The case makes its way to the Supreme Court. I'm talking about the case of William e Humphrey, sacked by Franklin d Roosevelt in 1933, and about a precedent that another fire at will president wants to overturn. A case that's a lot like Humphrey's has made its way back to the Supreme Court. It's about how much power over independent agencies the president can exert, and ultimately, how independent those agencies actually are. Donald Trump is making a play for a significant expansion of presidential control over the executive branch. Stephen Mazy is our Supreme Court correspondent. Trump versus Slaughter, a case the Supreme Court heard on Monday, is a direct challenge to every statute that shields directors of independent agencies from presidential dismissal. If the case goes his way, it could transform America, transferring a huge amount of power from Congress to the president and giving president Trump, along with future presidents, a degree of unilateral authority they have never had before. So, Stephen, before we get to the implications, let's wind back. How did we get here? Well, the story begins in March when Trump decided to fire Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. Slaughter was one of …