Investor Stories 455: Lessons Learned: Building Investment Criteria, Missing HubSpot, and Staying True to Your Model (Madera, Agarwal, Bussgang)

Today's episode of TFR is brought to you by .techdomains. The right .com is usually taken, and adding extra words weakens your signal. I see thousands of decks every year, and a clean domain still matters. That's why founders choose .tech. It's simple, modern, and sends the right signal. Secure your .tech domain early. And this episode of TFR is brought to you by the American Arbitration Association, where smart startups and investors turn for fast, efficient, and cost effective dispute resolution. Visit adr.org/tfr to learn more. Now here's the episode. Welcome to the podcast about venture capital, where investors and founders alike can learn how VCs make decisions and reach conviction. Your host is Nick Moran, and this is the full ratchet. Welcome back to TFR. On today's special segment, we ask guests to tell the most important lesson that they've learned in their career. Here's the segment called lessons learned. On today's special segment, we have Paul Madera, cofounder and general partner at Meritek. What is the biggest mistake or the hardest lesson that you've learned as an investor, and what's the story behind that lesson? I can't tell you any specific stories without outing the guilty. So but but as you can imagine, when we got started with the help of our sponsoring funds, Accel, Redpoint, Oak, and Worldview, they had portfolios full of companies they'd invested in in the nineties. And as they got as we went through the tech bubble, money dried up, opportunities dried up. A lot of their portfolio companies needed financing that was not available from anyone else. So some of the partners would come to Meritek and say, Hey, here's the company. You gotta fund it. Please write a check. And, we would look and figured out that if we invested in all those companies, that it would not let us raise our next fund. And so we had to very carefully and thoughtfully sort of create a set of criteria that made sense to invest on, and we follow that criteria to this day. And then we actually followed and stuck to it. And then and it worked in terms of helping us stay focused in the right in the right area and the right stage of company and looking for the right metrics. Can you tease any of the criteria without giving away the the secrets of Yeah. Yeah. We wanted to see 10,000,000 run rate. We wanna see very strong growth. We wanna see a business model that wasn't sort of 0% gross margins but gonna improve in the future. We wanted to see a sales force that was reasonably efficient. By the way, when we were investing in SaaS companies, there were no metrics. I mean, today, we all have this wonderful set of metrics to look for in terms of payback, in terms of, efficiency and and lifetime value. None of that was existing. So we were trying to make it up as we went along. …