Skip to main content
The Breakdown

Is Crypto Becoming Fintech? | Nick Almond

32 min episode · 2 min read
·
Nick Almond

Episode

32 min

Read time

2 min

Topics

Startups, Fundraising & VC, Design & UX

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Value accrual as a classification framework: Determine whether a project is crypto-native or fintech by tracking where generated value flows. If fees and revenue exit to centralized shareholders — as pump.fun did for much of its lifecycle — the project functions as a fintech extractor. Genuinely crypto-native projects redistribute value back to validators, stakers, and the broader on-chain ecosystem.
  • Fintech liquidity funnels will remain largely separate: Stablecoin adoption through platforms like Stripe's Tempo will bring trillions in liquidity onto blockchains, but the user personas transacting through fintech rails will not meaningfully migrate into native DeFi. Only single-digit percentages of fintech-onboarded users need to cross over to produce a material impact on the crypto ecosystem.
  • Institutional crypto narratives lag by approximately four years: TradFi and fintech institutions excel at operationalizing proven processes but struggle at technology frontiers. Crypto-native teams retain a structural speed advantage in areas like AI-agent integration and novel economic design, where institutional inertia prevents rapid iteration and deployment of genuinely new financial primitives.
  • Liquidity fragmentation accelerates as fintechs build proprietary chains: Robinhood Chain and Stripe's Tempo represent a pattern where each major fintech creates its own ecosystem, capturing value internally. Bridges become critical infrastructure, but fintechs will likely build proprietary bridges too, compounding fragmentation. Venture capital is already funding startups that service fintechs entering on-chain environments, shifting funding away from crypto-native dApps.
  • Decentralized governance and permissionlessness are crypto's defensible differentiators: Tokens alone do not separate crypto from fintech — DAOs, decentralized protocol governance, and permissionless finance do. Jito's model, where protocol decisions are made through decentralized governance rather than unilateral corporate control, represents a structural feature no fintech can replicate without fundamentally changing its legal and organizational architecture.

What It Covers

Nick Almond, head of governance at Jito Foundation, and host David Canales examine whether crypto is absorbing fintech or vice versa, analyzing where value accrues on-chain versus off-chain, how liquidity fragmentation grows as fintechs build proprietary chains, and why crypto's permissionless architecture remains its core differentiator.

Key Questions Answered

  • Value accrual as a classification framework: Determine whether a project is crypto-native or fintech by tracking where generated value flows. If fees and revenue exit to centralized shareholders — as pump.fun did for much of its lifecycle — the project functions as a fintech extractor. Genuinely crypto-native projects redistribute value back to validators, stakers, and the broader on-chain ecosystem.
  • Fintech liquidity funnels will remain largely separate: Stablecoin adoption through platforms like Stripe's Tempo will bring trillions in liquidity onto blockchains, but the user personas transacting through fintech rails will not meaningfully migrate into native DeFi. Only single-digit percentages of fintech-onboarded users need to cross over to produce a material impact on the crypto ecosystem.
  • Institutional crypto narratives lag by approximately four years: TradFi and fintech institutions excel at operationalizing proven processes but struggle at technology frontiers. Crypto-native teams retain a structural speed advantage in areas like AI-agent integration and novel economic design, where institutional inertia prevents rapid iteration and deployment of genuinely new financial primitives.
  • Liquidity fragmentation accelerates as fintechs build proprietary chains: Robinhood Chain and Stripe's Tempo represent a pattern where each major fintech creates its own ecosystem, capturing value internally. Bridges become critical infrastructure, but fintechs will likely build proprietary bridges too, compounding fragmentation. Venture capital is already funding startups that service fintechs entering on-chain environments, shifting funding away from crypto-native dApps.
  • Decentralized governance and permissionlessness are crypto's defensible differentiators: Tokens alone do not separate crypto from fintech — DAOs, decentralized protocol governance, and permissionless finance do. Jito's model, where protocol decisions are made through decentralized governance rather than unilateral corporate control, represents a structural feature no fintech can replicate without fundamentally changing its legal and organizational architecture.

Notable Moment

Almond applies a personal bear market heuristic — asking whether the ecosystem has accumulated enough fraud and speculation to warrant a purge. For the first time across multiple cycles, his answer is no, leading him to characterize the current downturn as consolidation and price discovery rather than a full multi-year collapse.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

Episode Transcript

I don't think we deserve a full bear market this time. So my heuristic for sort of crypto bear markets is, do we deserve it? Is is there enough scam that needs to be purged from the system? And I don't feel like we deserve it this time. For the first time, every previous bear market, I felt like, yeah, we absolutely deserved that. There's too much potential. There's too there's too much moving at the big scale for it to feel, like, completely hopeless at this point. Welcome to The Breakdown. I'm your host, David Canales. The following conversation flows on from a recent episode which growing relationship between crypto and fintech and the tension over which camp stands to benefit the most as global finance moves on chain. For the best viewer experience, it's worth going back and checking it out if you missed it. And don't forget to hit like and subscribe so you don't miss anymore. And with that out of the way, let's start the show. Nothing said on the breakdown is a recommendation to buy or sell securities or tokens. This podcast is for informational purposes only, and any views expressed by anyone in the show are opinions, not financial advice. Hosts and guests may hold positions in the company's funds or projects discussed. With me is returning guest Nick Armond, the head of governance at the Judo Foundation. Welcome back, Nick. Hi, David. Good to see you again. Cool. Okay. So the topic of today is, yeah, fintech and whether whether crypto is becoming fintech or or the other way around whether fintech is going crypto. So I suppose a good way to start this is, you know, Solana is so crypto native and and Jita itself is also crypto native within the that context too. So do you feel like you're working in fintech or do you feel like you're you're working in crypto these days? It's an interesting question. I I I do feel like Jito feels very crypto to work at. Attitude, sort of the pace, frontier technology. It certainly doesn't feel like what I conceptualize fintech as. Is it getting more institutional? Is more of the conversation becoming about how we interact with institutions and is more of it becoming about conversations around ETFs and ETPs and and, custodial integration, things like that. Yeah. Absolutely. There's more of the conversation is increasingly taking institutional form, but it's also, you know, frontier technology. And we're sort of deep in architecting how blocks are built, and it feels very new in that sense. It's new market structure and a new world that we're playing in. But there is certainly an element of the this the synthesis happening between the sort of traditional world and crypto. Yeah. And it's difficult because, yeah, the the frontier technology thing, by by warrant of that definition, you're gonna start with a relatively small user base and then have to go out and find new users. …

Get the full transcript (5,442 words) + summary by email — free

One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.

One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.

Browse all The Breakdown transcripts →

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 29-minute episode.

Get The Breakdown summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode

SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links. As an Amazon Associate, SignalCast earns from qualifying purchases.

Products

  • by Robinhood

    Robinhood Chain and Stripe's Tempo represent a pattern where each major fintech creates its own ecosystem
  • by Stripe

    Stablecoin adoption through platforms like Stripe's Tempo will bring trillions in liquidity onto blockchains
  • If fees and revenue exit to centralized shareholders — as pump.fun did for much of its lifecycle — the project functions as a fintech extractor.

company

  • Nick Almond, head of governance at Jito Foundation, and host David Canales examine whether crypto is absorbing fintech or vice versa

More from The Breakdown

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

Explore Related Topics

This podcast is featured in Best Crypto Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

Read this week's Startups & Product Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.

You're clearly into The Breakdown.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from The Breakdown and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime