Our Favorite Things, 2025
Episode
75 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Fundraising & VC, Leadership, Sales & Revenue
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Agency Independence Under Threat: Trump v. Slaughter arguments reveal justices may eliminate protections preventing presidential removal of independent agency heads, allowing consolidation of executive power over agencies like FTC and FEC that currently check corporate monopolies and protect consumers from billion-dollar industries seeking deregulation.
- ✓Campaign Finance Coordination Already Happening: Despite Supreme Court justices calling circumvention of contribution limits speculative, joint fundraising committees in 2016 elections collected hundreds of thousands per donor, immediately transferring funds from state party accounts back to national committees, with some state parties unaware contributions passed through their accounts.
- ✓FEC Rendered Non-Functional: Federal Election Commission now operates with only two commissioners after Trump fired Ellen Weintraub and three Republican commissioners departed, falling below the four-member quorum required for enforcement actions, effectively preventing the agency from interpreting or enforcing campaign finance laws regardless of Supreme Court rulings.
- ✓Decapitation Strategy Across Agencies: Presidential firings without replacing commissioners creates functional elimination of agencies including NLRB and CPSC, achieving government dismantling goals through constitutional authority claims rather than unpopular Doge-style cuts, while intimidating remaining federal employees from voicing independent opinions contradicting administration positions.
- ✓Wisconsin Supreme Court Fiction: Conservative Wisconsin justices fabricated quotes from Moore v. Harper claiming state courts have exceedingly limited redistricting roles, later modifying opinions nonsensically after the quote proved nonexistent, attempting to block challenges to extreme partisan gerrymanders that could undo Republican electoral advantages statewide.
What It Covers
Strict Scrutiny hosts discuss Supreme Court oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter on agency independence and RNC v. FEC on campaign finance, featuring former FEC Commissioner Ellen Weintraub on threats to regulatory oversight.
Key Questions Answered
- •Agency Independence Under Threat: Trump v. Slaughter arguments reveal justices may eliminate protections preventing presidential removal of independent agency heads, allowing consolidation of executive power over agencies like FTC and FEC that currently check corporate monopolies and protect consumers from billion-dollar industries seeking deregulation.
- •Campaign Finance Coordination Already Happening: Despite Supreme Court justices calling circumvention of contribution limits speculative, joint fundraising committees in 2016 elections collected hundreds of thousands per donor, immediately transferring funds from state party accounts back to national committees, with some state parties unaware contributions passed through their accounts.
- •FEC Rendered Non-Functional: Federal Election Commission now operates with only two commissioners after Trump fired Ellen Weintraub and three Republican commissioners departed, falling below the four-member quorum required for enforcement actions, effectively preventing the agency from interpreting or enforcing campaign finance laws regardless of Supreme Court rulings.
- •Decapitation Strategy Across Agencies: Presidential firings without replacing commissioners creates functional elimination of agencies including NLRB and CPSC, achieving government dismantling goals through constitutional authority claims rather than unpopular Doge-style cuts, while intimidating remaining federal employees from voicing independent opinions contradicting administration positions.
- •Wisconsin Supreme Court Fiction: Conservative Wisconsin justices fabricated quotes from Moore v. Harper claiming state courts have exceedingly limited redistricting roles, later modifying opinions nonsensically after the quote proved nonexistent, attempting to block challenges to extreme partisan gerrymanders that could undo Republican electoral advantages statewide.
Notable Moment
Justice Kavanaugh expressed concern about agencies exercising massive power over billion-dollar industries, revealing the court's framing prioritizes corporate interests over the original purpose of regulatory agencies: protecting citizens, consumers, and employees from concentrated wealth and monopolistic business practices.
Episode Transcript
Strict scrutiny is brought to you by Smalls. Hey, all you childless cat ladies. I love you ladies, and you love strict scrutiny. But you know what else you love? You love your cat, and you want the very best for your cat. So if you have a cat that's a kind of picky eater, I've got something for you. One of my friends has a cat. The cat's getting older, having some stomach issues. And I was like, you know what? I'm gonna do this cat a solid. I ordered my friend a sampler from Smalls. And guess what? Her cat loved it. He is gobbling it up like a kitten again. For a limited time, you can get 60% off your first order of Smalls, including free shipping, when you head to smalls.com forward slash strict. Small's cat food is protein packed with great recipes that are made with preservative free ingredients, the kinds of things that you would find in your fridge, and it's all delivered right to your door. That's why cats.com named Small's their best overall cat food. And starting with Smalls is easy. You just share info about your cat's diet, health, and food preferences, and Smalls puts together a personalized sampler for your cat. No more picking between random brands at the pet store. Smalls has the right food to satisfy your cat's cravings. And now it's not just cat food. You can get all of your other cat favorites at Smalls, like amazing treats and snacks and just add them to your Smalls order. After switching to Smalls, eighty eight percent of cat owners reported overall health improvements. That is a big deal. The team at Smalls is so confident that your cat will love their products that they have allowed you to try it risk free. That means you try it, and they will refund you if your cat won't eat their food. So what are you waiting for? Give the cats in your life the food that they deserve. For a limited time, because you are an avid strict scrutiny listener, you can get 60% off your first order plus free shipping. Just head over to smalls.com/strict. One last time, that's 60% off your first order of smalls plus free shipping when you head to smalls.com/strict. Mister chief justice, may it please the court? It's an old joke, but when I argue a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they're going to have the last word. She spoke not elegantly, but with unmistakable clarity. She said, I ask no favor for my sex. All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks. Hello and welcome back to strict scrutiny, your podcast about the Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it. We are your hosts. I'm Kate Shaw. I'm Leah Littman. And I'm Melissa Murray and it's that time of the year again. Here at strict scrutiny, we have many traditions. …
Get the full transcript (14,115 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 72-minute episode.
Get Strict Scrutiny summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Strict Scrutiny
We Need To Talk About Court Expansion
Sep 3 · 44 min
The Daily (NYT)
The Supreme Court Takes On Birthright Citizenship
Apr 2
More from Strict Scrutiny
SCOTUS Greenlights Trump's Ballroom
Sep 1 · 34 min
Up First (NPR)
Hegseth Scrutiny, Jan 6th Pipe Bomb Suspect, Texas Redistricting Ruling
Dec 5
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links. As an Amazon Associate, SignalCast earns from qualifying purchases.
Products
“Cards Against Humanity appears in the sponsors section: 'Sponsors [Smalls, Planned Parenthood, CookUnity, Cards Against Humanity]'”
company
“Planned Parenthood appears in the sponsors section: 'Sponsors [Smalls, Planned Parenthood, CookUnity, Cards Against Humanity]'”
“Smalls appears in the sponsors section: 'Sponsors [Smalls, Planned Parenthood, CookUnity, Cards Against Humanity]'”
“CookUnity appears in the sponsors section: 'Sponsors [Smalls, Planned Parenthood, CookUnity, Cards Against Humanity]'”
More from Strict Scrutiny
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
We Need To Talk About Court Expansion
SCOTUS Greenlights Trump's Ballroom
Is SCOTUS Letting Trump Meddle in the Midterms?
Know Your Rights: Do You Have to Talk to Cops?
What Does Peak Fascism Look Like?
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
The Daily (NYT)
Apr 2
The Supreme Court Takes On Birthright Citizenship
Up First (NPR)
Dec 5
Hegseth Scrutiny, Jan 6th Pipe Bomb Suspect, Texas Redistricting Ruling
Throughline
Jun 26
What the Supreme Court Does in the Shadows
The Daily (NYT)
Sep 9
Trump’s War on Mail-In Voting
The Daily (NYT)
Jun 26
Supreme Court Delivers Big Wins for Trump’s Immigration Agenda
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best Politics Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
You're clearly into Strict Scrutiny.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Strict Scrutiny and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime