11.4- The Election of 2244

This holiday season, reach for the one butter that never disappoints, Kerrygold. Made with milk from grass fed cows on Irish family farms, it's rich, creamy, and perfect for baking. Whether browning butter for cookies or crafting the flakiest pie crust, Kerrygold's high butter fat content makes all the difference in flavor and texture. Holiday treats will taste extraordinary. Hello, and welcome to revolutions. Episode 11.4, the election of twenty two forty four. As with any revolution, historians argue about where to put our arbitrary and invisible temporal brackets to define the period we call the Martian revolution. Just last week, for example, I said that the Martian centenary in twenty two o nine was a good place to draw a line and say, this is when the swirling forces that become the Martian Revolution start converging. But that was forty years before the Revolution, and I'm happy to admit that contingencies, accidents, and different choices could have led Earth and Mars to very different historical outcomes. In twenty two zero nine, the Martian revolution was not inevitable. So the question is, when do we start to feel like those converging forces are coalescing into an unavoidable sequence of events? The death of Vernon Byrd in February 2244 is an awfully tempting place to draw that line. Now last week, I also mentioned the historian Hamish So to. He's the one who said that Martian independence was still contingent and avoidable heading into 2247. But I think it's unconsciously revealing that while So to staked out this provocative thesis in the declaration of Martian independence, crisis, and contingency, when it came time to write his own general history of the period, Mars in revolution, where does chapter one begin? That's right. In 2244 with the death of Vernon Byrd. Because even So to must admit that at a certain point, the array of contingency becomes circumscribed by the actual historical actors in place at a certain moment. We can always say, hypothetically, a person could have done this different or that different, But could they have? Contingent choices don't come from nowhere. They are born of the psychology and personality of the historical actors themselves, which are not necessarily as mutable as we might suppose. Everyone knows Napoleon made a world historical mistake when he invaded Russia in 1812, and had he made a different choice, history would have gone very differently. But that choice was born of Napoleon's personality, his experiences, his beliefs. Is it really true Napoleon could have made a different choice in that moment? No. I don't want to stray into dogmatic determinism here. I'm just saying that the reason the death of Vernon Byrd is such a critical causal moment in the coming revolution is less about Byrd exiting the story, and more about who is entering the story. Timothy Warner. And while one might yell and scream at Warner to do something, anything different in the years to come, was he really capable of …