#330 Sebastian Risi: Why AI Should Be Grown, Not Trained
Episode
60 min
Read time
3 min
Topics
Health & Wellness, Fundraising & VC, Artificial Intelligence
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Neuroevolution vs. Gradient Descent: Rather than following a single downhill slope toward a solution, neuroevolution deploys a population of candidates across the entire search landscape simultaneously, using variation and selection to find solutions. This approach navigates non-differentiable, jagged problem spaces where backpropagation fails — making it applicable to discrete actions, novel architectures, and hyperparameter search without requiring smooth mathematical functions.
- ✓Hebbian Plasticity for Damage Resilience: Networks trained with local Hebbian learning rules — where connection strength updates based on how often two neurons fire together — continuously rewire during operation rather than freezing weights after training. In robotics experiments, quadruped controllers using these plastic networks maintained locomotion after leg removal, a scenario never seen during training, because the network self-organized in real time using only evolved local rules.
- ✓Growing Networks from a Single Neuron: Risi's Neural Developmental Program embeds a small recurrent network inside every neuron, allowing the overall network to grow from one node to thousands by having neurons communicate locally and decide when to spawn new nodes or modify connections. Tested on robotic tasks and a small MNIST variant, networks reached several thousand nodes — orders of magnitude smaller than current models, but the architecture scales without predefined structure.
- ✓Evolutionary Model Merging for Capability Combination: Sakana AI's evolutionary model merging uses evolutionary search to identify which layers from separate pre-trained models to combine, producing a merged model that inherits capabilities from both parents. In published experiments, a Japanese-language model and a math-specialized model were merged to produce a single model proficient in both domains — without any additional gradient-based training on combined data.
- ✓LLMs as Mutation Operators for Scientific Search: Replacing hand-coded genetic operators with large language models creates a powerful hybrid search system. The LLM generates candidate solutions or code variants, evolutionary selection scores them by fitness, and the best candidates seed the next generation. Applied to circle-packing optimization and early AI Scientist experiments — including a workshop-accepted paper — this loop improves automatically as the underlying language model improves.
What It Covers
Sebastian Risi, researcher at Sakana AI and author of *Neuroevolution*, explains why evolutionary algorithms offer a fundamentally different path to AI than gradient descent — covering plastic neural networks that rewire during operation, networks that grow from a single neuron, and how combining large language models with evolutionary search could automate scientific discovery.
Key Questions Answered
- •Neuroevolution vs. Gradient Descent: Rather than following a single downhill slope toward a solution, neuroevolution deploys a population of candidates across the entire search landscape simultaneously, using variation and selection to find solutions. This approach navigates non-differentiable, jagged problem spaces where backpropagation fails — making it applicable to discrete actions, novel architectures, and hyperparameter search without requiring smooth mathematical functions.
- •Hebbian Plasticity for Damage Resilience: Networks trained with local Hebbian learning rules — where connection strength updates based on how often two neurons fire together — continuously rewire during operation rather than freezing weights after training. In robotics experiments, quadruped controllers using these plastic networks maintained locomotion after leg removal, a scenario never seen during training, because the network self-organized in real time using only evolved local rules.
- •Growing Networks from a Single Neuron: Risi's Neural Developmental Program embeds a small recurrent network inside every neuron, allowing the overall network to grow from one node to thousands by having neurons communicate locally and decide when to spawn new nodes or modify connections. Tested on robotic tasks and a small MNIST variant, networks reached several thousand nodes — orders of magnitude smaller than current models, but the architecture scales without predefined structure.
- •Evolutionary Model Merging for Capability Combination: Sakana AI's evolutionary model merging uses evolutionary search to identify which layers from separate pre-trained models to combine, producing a merged model that inherits capabilities from both parents. In published experiments, a Japanese-language model and a math-specialized model were merged to produce a single model proficient in both domains — without any additional gradient-based training on combined data.
- •LLMs as Mutation Operators for Scientific Search: Replacing hand-coded genetic operators with large language models creates a powerful hybrid search system. The LLM generates candidate solutions or code variants, evolutionary selection scores them by fitness, and the best candidates seed the next generation. Applied to circle-packing optimization and early AI Scientist experiments — including a workshop-accepted paper — this loop improves automatically as the underlying language model improves.
- •Co-evolving Agents and Environments via Curriculum: The POET algorithm and its successors evolve agent and environment simultaneously, starting with simple terrain and progressively increasing difficulty. Agents that would fail on complex environments from the start succeed when scaffolded through graduated challenges. Extending this with LLM-generated Unity environments or neural network world models could allow neuroevolution to tackle significantly more complex tasks than current fixed-environment benchmarks support.
Notable Moment
Risi describes a counterintuitive failure in plasticity research: a network trained in a T-maze consistently chose the smaller reward because it learned to track and follow rewards — technically closer to the correct behavior than a network that always turned right, yet scoring worse. Traditional fitness selection would eliminate the more capable network first.
Episode Transcript
We can take an example of how nature evolved intelligence and use evolution instead. When you use a a static fixed network that is not changing the weights during its lifetime, if you cut off the leg, it will probably fail because it can't adapt. But these heavier networks, they change the weights all the time. It's basically like a continually learning, updating system where you can cut off a leg, and oftentimes, it will still be able to function even though it has never seen this kind of variation during training? Let me jump in with a little explanation before we get started. This is a very technical podcast, but one of the more interesting ones that I've recorded in a while, and I want as many people as possible to benefit from it. I'll begin by explaining in simple terms what gradient descent is, which is used in most neural networks today as opposed to neuroevolution, which is what this podcast is about. An illustration of gradient descent is standing blindfolded on a mountainside with the goal of finding the lowest point in the landscape. That lowest point is the solution. Your distance from it is the error or loss. To get to the solution, you try to reduce that error step by step. So you feel around with your foot to find which direction the ground slopes downward. You then take a step in that direction. You repeat that process until every other direction feels uphill. At that point, you've reached a low point called a minima, though not necessarily the lowest point in the whole mountain range, which would be called the global minima. With neuroevolution, imagine a plane flies over the whole mountain range and drops many people with different search strategies in many different places. One wanders to his left, another to his right. One walks in widening circles, another takes big jumps, another small ones. After a while, you see who ended up at the lowest point. You keep the best strategies, make variations of them, combine some of them, maybe the jumping and the walking in a widening circle, and then you send out a new group of people with those strategies. Over time, your people get better and better at finding the lowest point, even though none of them ever knew which way was downhill. That is the difference. You have a better chance of finding the global minima, the lowest point in the entire mountain range. With gradient descent, you improve by following the slope. With neuroevolution, you improve by variation and selection. You try many candidates, score the results, keep the better ones, and make new variants from them. No one has to know which way is downhill. To begin, you have this new book out, neuroevolution. Mhmm. So maybe you can start by explaining what neuroevolution is in AI. Sure. So neuroevolution is the idea of combining evolutionary algorithms with evolution. So so the idea is instead of …
Get the full transcript (10,568 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 57-minute episode.
Get Eye on AI summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Eye on AI
From Zero to 150 Robots in Just 20 Months | Mike LeBlanc, Foundation Future Industries
Aug 19 · 66 min
The Jordan Harbinger Show
1334: Justin Garcia | Why We Live, Cheat, Break, and Die for Love
May 28
More from Eye on AI
Why People Are Paying 10x More for AI - and What That Means for the Chip Market | Sid Sheth, d-Matrix
Aug 17 · 50 min
The School of Greatness
Break the Cycle of Toxic Love for Good | Sheleana Aiyana
Jun 26
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links. As an Amazon Associate, SignalCast earns from qualifying purchases.
Books
- NeuroevolutionBy guest
by Sebastian Risi
“Sebastian Risi, researcher at Sakana AI and author of *Neuroevolution*, explains why evolutionary algorithms offer a fundamentally different path to AI than gradient descent”
company
“Sebastian Risi, researcher at Sakana AI and author of *Neuroevolution*, explains why evolutionary algorithms... Sakana AI's evolutionary model merging uses evolutionary search to identify which layers from separate pre-trained models to combine”
More from Eye on AI
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
From Zero to 150 Robots in Just 20 Months | Mike LeBlanc, Foundation Future Industries
Why People Are Paying 10x More for AI - and What That Means for the Chip Market | Sid Sheth, d-Matrix
American Companies Have 36 Months to Go AI-Native or Get Left Behind | Drew Cukor, TWG AI
Why People Are Paying 10x More for AI | Sid Sheth, d-Matrix
AI Agents Fixing Your IT Before You Even Know Something Broke | Erhan Giral & Ryan Manning, BMC Helix
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
The Jordan Harbinger Show
May 28
1334: Justin Garcia | Why We Live, Cheat, Break, and Die for Love
The School of Greatness
Jun 26
Break the Cycle of Toxic Love for Good | Sheleana Aiyana
Modern Wisdom
Mar 23
#1075 - Roy Baumeister - Why Men Are At The Top Of Society (and the bottom)
The Art of Manliness
Feb 24
Born to Carry — How to Build Strength, Stamina, and Sanity Through Rucking
In Our Time
Apr 14
Charisma
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best AI Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
Read this week's Health & Longevity Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.
You're clearly into Eye on AI.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Eye on AI and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime