Who's really running AI? Inside the billion-dollar battle over regulation, with Alex Bores
Episode
22 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Fundraising & VC, Leadership, Sales & Revenue
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Regulatory landscape split: Public opinion on AI breaks into three distinct camps: roughly 10% want AI eliminated entirely, 10% (represented by Leading the Future) want zero regulation, and 80% want measured oversight ensuring broad societal benefit. Politicians targeting that 80% majority face disproportionate financial opposition from the minority "let it rip" faction funding super PACs.
- ✓RAISE Act scope: The law applies only to AI companies with over $500 million in revenue that have built sufficiently large frontier models — currently just Google, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic. Requirements include publishing and adhering to a safety plan and reporting catastrophic safety incidents that cause or could imminently cause injury or death.
- ✓Money asymmetry in AI politics: Leading the Future has raised $125 million and pledged at least $10 million specifically against Bores, while the pro-regulation Public First Action PAC (backed by $20 million from Anthropic) has spent under $500,000 supporting him — a 20-to-1 spending ratio that signals deliberate intimidation of state legislators.
- ✓Deepfake policy solution: Bores argues deepfakes are a solvable problem through mandatory adoption of C2PA, a free, open-source metadata standard already created by industry. New York legislation requiring content provenance via C2PA is near passage, with the governor including a version in her budget — a replicable model other states can adopt immediately.
- ✓AI training data transparency: Bores is advancing a bill requiring AI models to disclose basic training data information, including whether copyrighted material or personally identifiable information was used. A similar California bill passed the state assembly unanimously before stalling in the senate, suggesting broad bipartisan support exists for this specific, narrow disclosure requirement.
What It Covers
New York Assembly Member Alex Bores discusses his sponsorship of the RAISE Act, an AI safety law, and the resulting $10 million campaign against him by Leading the Future, a Silicon Valley super PAC backed by a16z, OpenAI's Greg Brockman, and Joe Lonsdale, revealing the financial scale of industry opposition to state-level AI regulation.
Key Questions Answered
- •Regulatory landscape split: Public opinion on AI breaks into three distinct camps: roughly 10% want AI eliminated entirely, 10% (represented by Leading the Future) want zero regulation, and 80% want measured oversight ensuring broad societal benefit. Politicians targeting that 80% majority face disproportionate financial opposition from the minority "let it rip" faction funding super PACs.
- •RAISE Act scope: The law applies only to AI companies with over $500 million in revenue that have built sufficiently large frontier models — currently just Google, Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and Anthropic. Requirements include publishing and adhering to a safety plan and reporting catastrophic safety incidents that cause or could imminently cause injury or death.
- •Money asymmetry in AI politics: Leading the Future has raised $125 million and pledged at least $10 million specifically against Bores, while the pro-regulation Public First Action PAC (backed by $20 million from Anthropic) has spent under $500,000 supporting him — a 20-to-1 spending ratio that signals deliberate intimidation of state legislators.
- •Deepfake policy solution: Bores argues deepfakes are a solvable problem through mandatory adoption of C2PA, a free, open-source metadata standard already created by industry. New York legislation requiring content provenance via C2PA is near passage, with the governor including a version in her budget — a replicable model other states can adopt immediately.
- •AI training data transparency: Bores is advancing a bill requiring AI models to disclose basic training data information, including whether copyrighted material or personally identifiable information was used. A similar California bill passed the state assembly unanimously before stalling in the senate, suggesting broad bipartisan support exists for this specific, narrow disclosure requirement.
Notable Moment
Bores revealed that when Leading the Future announced its campaign against him, he proactively sought meetings with all founding members through mutual contacts. Only one agreed to a fifteen-minute conversation. The group then shifted its ad strategy from opposing AI regulation to attacking his prior employment at Palantir over its ICE contracts — despite Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale funding the PAC.
Episode Transcript
It's tax season. And at LifeLock, we know you're tired of numbers. But here's a big one you need to hear, billions. That's the amount of money in refunds the IRS has flagged for possible identity fraud. Now here's another big number, 100,000,000. That's how many data points LifeLock monitors every second. If your identity is stolen, we'll fix it guaranteed. One last big number. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com/podcast for the threats you can't control. Terms apply. Hello, and welcome back to Equity, TechCrunch's flagship podcast about the business of startups. I'm Rebecca Belan, and we're doing something a little different here today instead of our usual Friday roundtable. This week, we've seen the Department of Defense putting pressure on anthropic to allow unrestricted use of its AI in the military. Meanwhile, across the country, people are rising up against AI data center build outs. I'm not sure about all of you, but my Twitter feed is full of industry people breaking down the conversation into doomers versus boomers. The people who think AI will save us all and the people who think it will kill us all. I think that most people are actually somewhere in the middle. There's a lot of us out there who see the awesome power of AI and wanna make sure that it's rolled out responsibly, that safety is taken into account rather than just moving fast and breaking things and enriching tech oligarchs. This is something that touches all of our lives. One of the people who is attempting to walk the middle road is Alex Borres. He's a New York assembly member who's running for New York's 12th Congressional District, and he's made headlines in recent months after incurring the wrath of Silicon Valley billionaires for his role in sponsoring New York's RAISE Act in AI safety bill. Okay. Alex, welcome to the show. Thanks for having me. Really excited to see you again. When we last met, I believe that was in DC, and we were both at an AGI conference trying to learn a little bit more about how do we govern this? How do we deal with this. So, yeah, clearly, a lot has happened in the last few months. And talking about the politics of it and the way that lobbying is happening around it. And so, yeah, a a lot of developments there as well. Yeah. I think on that day, actually, was the day that Leading the Future, which is a Silicon Valley ProAI pack backed by Joe Lonsdale. It's backed by a 16 z, backed by OpenAI president Greg Brockman. That's the day that they decided that they were gonna come after you. And I think they've spent what was it? Like, a hun no. Sorry. They've spent $1,000,000 on campaign ads against you. I think they've already spent, like, 1,300,000.0. They just did another 7 figure ad buy. They they have committed to spending at least $10,000,000 against me. …
Get the full transcript (4,271 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 19-minute episode.
Get Equity summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Equity
Apple's Ternus era begins as Nvidia bets on the whole AI stack
Sep 4 · 38 min
The Ezra Klein Show
Why Are Palantir and OpenAI Scared of Alex Bores?
Apr 21
More from Equity
We're ‘dangerously close’ to dead internet theory according to Pangram's CEO
Sep 2 · 25 min
Odd Lots
Meet the Politician the AI Industry Is Trying to Stop
Dec 18
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links.
Tools
- C2PARecommended
“Bores argues deepfakes are a solvable problem through mandatory adoption of C2PA, a free, open-source metadata standard already created by industry.”
company
“a $10 million campaign against him by Leading the Future, a Silicon Valley super PAC backed by a16z, OpenAI's Greg Brockman, and Joe Lonsdale”
“the pro-regulation Public First Action PAC (backed by $20 million from Anthropic) has spent under $500,000 supporting him”
other
- RAISE ActBy guest
“New York Assembly Member Alex Bores discusses his sponsorship of the RAISE Act, an AI safety law, and the resulting $10 million campaign against him by Leading the Future”
More from Equity
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
Apple's Ternus era begins as Nvidia bets on the whole AI stack
We're ‘dangerously close’ to dead internet theory according to Pangram's CEO
Will TikTok and YouTube follow Meta’s new rules for teens?
From the Spotify Mafia to the Lovable Mafia: inside Stockholm's founder network
The DOJ is investigating a16z. What does this mean for venture capital?
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
The Ezra Klein Show
Apr 21
Why Are Palantir and OpenAI Scared of Alex Bores?
Odd Lots
Dec 18
Meet the Politician the AI Industry Is Trying to Stop
Cognitive Revolution
Dec 19
AI 2025 → 2026 Live Show | Part 2
The Daily (NYT)
Aug 9
Is 'Gentle Parenting' Ruining French Children?
My First Million
Jun 30
The $30M app that lets you invest like a politician
Explore Related Topics
You're clearly into Equity.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Equity and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime