Skip to main content
Business Of Biotech

Making Biologics Orally Available With Vivtex's Thomas von Erlach, Ph.D.

53 min episode · 2 min read
·

Episode

53 min

Read time

2 min

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Stealth-mode validation: Vivtex spent roughly seven years validating its platform before raising its public profile, deliberately avoiding announcements until the technology could reliably produce commercially viable solid dosage formulations. For biotech founders, this approach reduces the risk of overpromising to partners and then having to backtrack when the platform's actual capabilities become clearer.
  • Non-dilutive pharma revenue: By securing approximately 10 pharma co-development partnerships early, Vivtex reached revenue-positive status without heavy reliance on venture capital. Founders should pursue select industry collaborations as a funding strategy, but limit early partners to a manageable number — von Erlach cautions against taking on 10 simultaneously while still refining the platform.
  • Trust-building through scientific transparency: The Novo Nordisk deal, worth up to $2.1 billion, grew from years of presenting data — including failures — at conferences and maintaining close ties with Novo's scientific team. Founders can accelerate partnership timelines by consistently sharing longitudinal progress publicly rather than only approaching potential partners with polished, final results.
  • In-house execution over CRO reliance: Vivtex keeps all screening, computational analysis, and solid dosage prototyping internal because external CROs cannot match the pace a survival-motivated small team maintains. When a company's existence depends on solving problems quickly, outsourcing critical platform work introduces delays that compound across multiple partner programs simultaneously.
  • Licensing structure with big pharma: Under the Novo Nordisk agreement, Vivtex licenses its existing formulation technologies and screening capabilities — including molecular dynamics simulation and AI-driven predictive modeling — while Novo retains full responsibility for development and commercialization. Smaller biotechs negotiating similar deals should benchmark terms against multiple simultaneous term sheets to accurately gauge real market value.

What It Covers

Thomas von Erlach, PhD, cofounder and CEO of Vivtex, describes how his MIT-spun company uses ex vivo GI tissue screening, computational modeling, and AI to create orally available biologics, culminating in a $2.1 billion partnership with Novo Nordisk targeting obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune diseases.

Key Questions Answered

  • Stealth-mode validation: Vivtex spent roughly seven years validating its platform before raising its public profile, deliberately avoiding announcements until the technology could reliably produce commercially viable solid dosage formulations. For biotech founders, this approach reduces the risk of overpromising to partners and then having to backtrack when the platform's actual capabilities become clearer.
  • Non-dilutive pharma revenue: By securing approximately 10 pharma co-development partnerships early, Vivtex reached revenue-positive status without heavy reliance on venture capital. Founders should pursue select industry collaborations as a funding strategy, but limit early partners to a manageable number — von Erlach cautions against taking on 10 simultaneously while still refining the platform.
  • Trust-building through scientific transparency: The Novo Nordisk deal, worth up to $2.1 billion, grew from years of presenting data — including failures — at conferences and maintaining close ties with Novo's scientific team. Founders can accelerate partnership timelines by consistently sharing longitudinal progress publicly rather than only approaching potential partners with polished, final results.
  • In-house execution over CRO reliance: Vivtex keeps all screening, computational analysis, and solid dosage prototyping internal because external CROs cannot match the pace a survival-motivated small team maintains. When a company's existence depends on solving problems quickly, outsourcing critical platform work introduces delays that compound across multiple partner programs simultaneously.
  • Licensing structure with big pharma: Under the Novo Nordisk agreement, Vivtex licenses its existing formulation technologies and screening capabilities — including molecular dynamics simulation and AI-driven predictive modeling — while Novo retains full responsibility for development and commercialization. Smaller biotechs negotiating similar deals should benchmark terms against multiple simultaneous term sheets to accurately gauge real market value.

Notable Moment

Von Erlach reveals that most of Vivtex's work is actually internal R&D, not partner-driven — a counterintuitive fact given its 10 pharma partnerships. The company runs six-to-twelve-month stealth programs, test-drives results with potential partners, then decides whether to expand or license each program.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 50-minute episode.

Get Business Of Biotech summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

More from Business Of Biotech

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

This podcast is featured in Best Biotech Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

You're clearly into Business Of Biotech.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Business Of Biotech and 192+ other podcasts. Free for up to 3 shows.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime