Skip to main content
ML

Michael Laskaway

Marshall Koslowski and States Forum Journal**state-centered Governance**the American Promise Framework**ai Regulation as a State-level Flashback**ballot-counting Speed as a Trust-building Tool
1episode
1podcast

We have 1 summarized appearance for Michael Laskaway so far. Browse all podcasts to discover more episodes.

Featured On 1 Podcast

Top resources Michael Laskaway mentions

Books, tools, and gear cited across podcast appearances. Ranked by frequency.

SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via affiliate links on each resource page.

All Appearances

1 episode
The Realignment

597 | Michael Laskaway: Why States Are the Real Center of American Politics

The Realignment
52 minEditor in Chief of the States Forum Journal

AI Summary

→ WHAT IT COVERS Marshall Koslowski and States Forum Journal editor-in-chief Michael Laskaway argue that American states — not Washington — are the functional center of political change, and that the center-left lacks a coherent narrative framework to capitalize on that power amid federal dysfunction. → KEY INSIGHTS - **State-centered governance:** The right has spent decades building infrastructure around state-level power while the left defaulted to federal solutions. States control utilities, election systems, degree requirements, and right-to-repair legislation — policy levers with direct, immediate impact on daily costs and quality of life that federal gridlock cannot touch. - **The American Promise framework:** States Forum uses four principles — representative democracy, effective government, fair markets, and personal freedom — drawn from the Declaration of Independence as an editorial and ideological test. This worldview functions as a fusionist filter, allowing thinkers across factional lines to collaborate without requiring agreement on every policy dispute. - **AI regulation as a state-level flashback:** When federal legislators proposed banning state-level AI regulation, both left and right state legislators pushed back — primarily because data centers are driving up local utility bills. Framing AI policy through constituent electricity costs, not abstract human flourishing, is what actually moves state-level coalitions. - **Ballot-counting speed as a trust-building tool:** Secretaries of state could spend the two years before 2028 publicly and aggressively reducing ballot-counting times. This technocratic fix carries rare narrative weight — it directly addresses a widespread, concrete source of institutional distrust without requiring any partisan concession on election integrity principles. - **Narrative before policy:** The center-left's struggle in long-form formats like three-hour podcasts stems from leading with policy plans rather than personal story arcs. A more effective approach connects policy positions to an evolving personal or historical narrative first, then derives the policy — the model the populist right has used consistently since the mid-2010s. → NOTABLE MOMENT Laskaway references historian Alan Brinkley's argument that New Deal economic conflicts were ultimately resolved not by intellectual debate but by historical circumstance — suggesting today's abundance-versus-anti-monopoly tensions may similarly require time and external events, not just better conference norms, to resolve. 💼 SPONSORS None detected 🏷️ State Politics, Liberalism Realignment, Federalism, AI Regulation, Political Narrative

Never miss Michael Laskaway's insights

Subscribe to get AI-powered summaries of Michael Laskaway's podcast appearances delivered to your inbox weekly.

Start Free Today

No credit card required • Free tier available