The Week: The Half-Trillion-Dollar AI Loop

Support for the show comes from KPMG. In any organization, disruption is inevitable, but struggling through it doesn't have to be. The KPMG adaptability index is your blueprint for building capabilities to handle what comes next. It uses real data to look at how your culture, strategy, and partnerships all work together to help your business thrive. Stop reacting and start adapting. Visit kpmg.com/us/adaptability to explore the adaptability index and pulse surveys today. Summer vacation has gotten very expensive. Flights, hotels, food, why bother? And so a lot of people, I think, just this summer are kind of looking around and saying, like, oh, I wanna go on vacation, but also, this is gonna be a really expensive disaster. This week on explain it to me, how to make the most of that precious PTO. New episodes, Sundays, wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to the week from Prop g Media, where we break down what mattered and what it all means. I'm George Hahn, and it's Friday, August 14. Today, NVIDIA's $500,000,000,000 bet on AI and what a weak jobs report tells us about the economy. Then Scott on America's declining power at home and abroad. And finally, why we're surrounded by sex but having less of it. Let's get into it. This week, the AI boom began to look less like a software revolution and more like a heavily financed construction project. Big tech is spending at an industrial scale. NVIDIA is helping finance its own customers, and no one can say exactly where the returns will come from. Last Friday, ProfG Markets ran its quarterly review with Aswath Damodaran, the NYU valuation professor Ed calls the dean of valuation. His point? That investors are now holding a very different kind of company than the one they bought five years ago. These companies five years ago, if you asked me what their invested capital was, I wouldn't even have cared because you knew that they could generate revenues and operating income with very little additional invested capital. Outside of acquisitions, even with r and d considered, these companies generated returns of seventy, eighty, 90% invested capital. The only survivor from that group is Apple, which still continues to deliver that kind of return, and analysts are not happy with it because it's not investing. The other companies now are the equivalent of manufacturing companies. They're building huge capacity for whatever, AI products and services. And like all manufacturing companies historically, they're now gonna be judged on whether they can deliver the earnings on this investment, something they've never had to do historically. So measures like return on investment capital that used to be not that useful with tech companies now come into play. Questions are, are you earning more than your cost of capital? A laughable question five years ago with these with these companies now becomes a relevant question. On Monday, Scott and Ed laid out the bull and bear cases side by side. The S and …