1304: Remote Viewing | Skeptical Sunday
Episode
49 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Investing, Startups, Design & UX
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Study replication as the baseline test: JB Rhine, founder of parapsychology at Duke University, produced ESP studies that no one has ever reliably replicated. Princeton ran over 25,000 trials across 132 subjects and found zero evidence. When results cannot be replicated independently, the original studies should be treated as invalid regardless of institutional prestige behind them.
- ✓Single-blind vs. double-blind methodology: Remote viewing sessions claimed to be double-blind were frequently single-blind, meaning monitors knew the target. This allowed conscious or unconscious cueing of viewers. When evaluating any study's credibility, verify that neither experimenter nor subject had access to target information — single-blind designs systematically inflate positive results.
- ✓Barnum statements inflate perceived accuracy: Remote viewers described targets using phrases like "large metallic object" or "near water" — descriptions broad enough to fit thousands of locations. Recognizing Barnum statements, vague descriptors that apply universally, is a practical tool for identifying pseudoscientific claims dressed as specific, verifiable predictions in research or everyday persuasion.
- ✓Apophenia and retroactive confirmation distort pattern recognition: The human brain is hardwired to find patterns in random data, a tendency called apophenia. Remote viewing proponents cited hits like "crane near Soviet nuclear facility" without accounting for base rates — nearly every facility has construction equipment nearby. Always ask what percentage of random guesses would produce the same result before treating a match as meaningful.
- ✓Government funding signals curiosity, not validity: The U.S. spent over 20 years and significant budget across programs like Grill Flame, Sunstreak, and Stargate purely because the Soviets were reportedly spending the equivalent of roughly $125 million annually on similar research. Competitive spending pressure, not evidence, drove the program. Institutional or government investment in a claim is not evidence the claim has merit.
What It Covers
Jordan Harbinger and researcher Nick Pell examine Project Stargate, the U.S. government's two-decade, multi-program effort to develop psychic spies through remote viewing. Despite millions in funding across agencies from the 1970s through 1995, the CIA's own review concluded zero actionable intelligence was ever produced.
Key Questions Answered
- •Study replication as the baseline test: JB Rhine, founder of parapsychology at Duke University, produced ESP studies that no one has ever reliably replicated. Princeton ran over 25,000 trials across 132 subjects and found zero evidence. When results cannot be replicated independently, the original studies should be treated as invalid regardless of institutional prestige behind them.
- •Single-blind vs. double-blind methodology: Remote viewing sessions claimed to be double-blind were frequently single-blind, meaning monitors knew the target. This allowed conscious or unconscious cueing of viewers. When evaluating any study's credibility, verify that neither experimenter nor subject had access to target information — single-blind designs systematically inflate positive results.
- •Barnum statements inflate perceived accuracy: Remote viewers described targets using phrases like "large metallic object" or "near water" — descriptions broad enough to fit thousands of locations. Recognizing Barnum statements, vague descriptors that apply universally, is a practical tool for identifying pseudoscientific claims dressed as specific, verifiable predictions in research or everyday persuasion.
- •Apophenia and retroactive confirmation distort pattern recognition: The human brain is hardwired to find patterns in random data, a tendency called apophenia. Remote viewing proponents cited hits like "crane near Soviet nuclear facility" without accounting for base rates — nearly every facility has construction equipment nearby. Always ask what percentage of random guesses would produce the same result before treating a match as meaningful.
- •Government funding signals curiosity, not validity: The U.S. spent over 20 years and significant budget across programs like Grill Flame, Sunstreak, and Stargate purely because the Soviets were reportedly spending the equivalent of roughly $125 million annually on similar research. Competitive spending pressure, not evidence, drove the program. Institutional or government investment in a claim is not evidence the claim has merit.
Notable Moment
The CIA's own contracted review by the American Institutes for Research, involving both a pro-parapsychology statistician and a skeptical psychologist, concluded the remote viewing data was statistically marginal but completely operationally useless — not a single report ever provided unique, verifiable intelligence distinguishable from random chance.
Episode Transcript
Episode is sponsored in part by LinkedIn. Hiring for a small business is one of those things that sounds simple until you actually do it because you're not just filling a seat, you're choosing somebody who's gonna affect your team, your customers, your culture, and your stress level. And when you get it wrong, you feel it immediately. Cost you time, momentum, and way more money than people want to admit. That's why LinkedIn Hiring Pro is so useful. It's basically like having a hiring partner built for small teams, something that helps you hire with confidence without turning hiring into a second job. You can describe what you need in plain language and it helps streamline the whole process. Drafting the job, surfacing the right candidates, shortlisting them, even handling AI powered interviews for the initial screening step. So instead of spending hours buried in applications, you spend more time talking to the people who actually have a real shot at being a great hire. And it's fast. Nearly 60% of hirers find a candidate to interview within a week. So if you wanna save time without sacrificing quality and you wanna hire right the first time, check out LinkedIn Hiring Pro. Hire right the first time. Post your first job and get a $100 off toward your job post at linkedin.com/harbinger. That's linkedin.com/harbinger. Terms and conditions apply. Welcome to Skeptical Sunday. I'm your host, Jordan Harbinger. Today, I'm here with Skeptical Sunday cohost, writer, and researcher Nick Bell. On the Jordan Harbinger Show, we encode the stories, secrets, and skills of the world's most fascinating people and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you. Our mission is to help you become a better informed, more critical thinker. And during the week, we have long form conversations with a variety of amazing folks from spies to CEOs, athletes, authors, thinkers, performers. On Sundays, though, it's skeptical Sunday. A rotating guest cohost and I will break down a topic you may have never thought about and debunk common misconceptions about that topic. Topics like why expiration dates on food are mostly nonsense, acupuncture, recycling, chemtrails, the lottery, reiki healing, and more. And if you're new to the show or you wanna tell your friends about the show, I suggest our episode starter packs. These are collections of our favorite episodes on persuasion, negotiation, psychology, disinformation, junk science, crime and cults, and more that'll help new listeners get a taste of everything we do here on the show. Just visit jordanharbinger.com/start or search for us in your Spotify app to get started. Alright, guys and girls. Strap yourself in because this is gonna be a weird one. Not that we ever give Nick Pell any skeptical Sunday topic that's not weird, by the way. This one, though, this is like something out of Stranger Things or the X Files, but the United States government has put tons of money …
Get the full transcript (9,888 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 46-minute episode.
Get The Jordan Harbinger Show summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from The Jordan Harbinger Show
1367: Annie Jacobsen | The Genes and Germs of Biological Warfare
Aug 11 · 107 min
Foundr
632: (Solo) Why In-Person Still Wins (Even in a Remote World)
Feb 16
More from The Jordan Harbinger Show
1366: Gut Health | Skeptical Sunday
Aug 9 · 82 min
The Daily (NYT)
Why Adults Are Getting Cancer at a Younger Age
Aug 10
Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode
SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links.
company
“The CIA's own contracted review by the American Institutes for Research, involving both a pro-parapsychology statistician and a skeptical psychologist, concluded the remote viewing data was statistically marginal but completely operationally useless.”
More from The Jordan Harbinger Show
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
1367: Annie Jacobsen | The Genes and Germs of Biological Warfare
1366: Gut Health | Skeptical Sunday
1365: Strange Estrangement from Down in the Basement | Feedback Friday
1364: Dr. Max Butterfield | Challenging Viral Dating Myths with Science
1363: Allegations Untrue? Who's Next In the Queue? | Feedback Friday
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
Foundr
Feb 16
632: (Solo) Why In-Person Still Wins (Even in a Remote World)
The Daily (NYT)
Aug 10
Why Adults Are Getting Cancer at a Younger Age
No Priors: Artificial Intelligence | Technology | Startups
Aug 6
Chasing Trillion-Dollar Companies, Founder Ambition, Token Budgets, and Regulatory Capture with Sarah & Elad
Planet Money
Jul 24
Piles of cash and a town of solutions in Kenya, Nigeria (Summer School)
The Rich Roll Podcast
Jul 23
Malcolm Gladwell & Chris Chavez Think We're Selling Running All Wrong
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best Mindset Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
Read this week's Investing & Markets Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.
You're clearly into The Jordan Harbinger Show.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from The Jordan Harbinger Show and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime