Michael Weiss: Trump’s Fee-Fees Are Hurt

What It Covers

Tim Miller and Michael Weiss analyze four converging geopolitical crises: the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling striking down Trump's emergency tariffs, the buildup toward a US military strike on Iran, the stalled Ukraine peace process, and Marco Rubio's strategic compromise between MAGA loyalty and traditional Republican foreign policy principles.

Key Questions Answered

• •Supreme Court Tariff Ruling: The 6-3 ruling against Trump's emergency tariffs, with Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissenting, removes his primary economic leverage tool against both allies and adversaries. This may inadvertently benefit Gulf-state business partners like Kushner and Witkoff, whose multi-billion dollar regional investments depend on avoiding economic disruption across Middle Eastern markets.
• •Iran Strike Logic: The case for a US military strike on Iran rests less on strategic doctrine than on Trump's desire for a legacy-defining moment. Two carrier strike groups are positioned in the Gulf specifically to absorb Iranian ballistic missile retaliation. However, no credible post-strike plan exists for preventing Iran from reconstituting its threat capabilities afterward.
• •Rubio's Calculated Compromise: Rubio operates as a covert Reaganite inside a MAGA administration, making deliberate trade-offs. He reportedly intervened to kill a pro-Russian Ukraine settlement in November by privately calling Senate contacts to label it a "Russian wish list." His primary objective appears to be leveraging his position to achieve regime change in Cuba before Trump's term ends.
• •Ukraine Intelligence Dependency: Despite reducing financial and military support by 99% since January, the US continues providing CIA targeting packages to Ukraine for strikes inside Russian territory, including energy infrastructure. European nations have compensated by increasing military hardware contributions 60% and humanitarian support 50%, yet remain excluded from leading diplomatic negotiations.
• •ICE Tactical Shift: Federal immigration enforcement is deliberately moving operations from urban protest hubs toward exurban and rural communities where constitutional observer networks are sparse. Protesters at Minneapolis ICE headquarters report agents from Wisconsin communities with populations too dispersed to sustain organized monitoring, suggesting a deliberate strategy to reduce visibility of enforcement actions.