Semen Retention: Should You Stop Ejaculating?
Episode
43 min
Read time
2 min
Topics
Health & Wellness, Psychology & Behavior, Science & Discovery
AI-Generated Summary
Key Takeaways
- ✓Testosterone levels: Abstaining from ejaculation for twenty days does not increase baseline testosterone levels. The only measurable testosterone bump occurs immediately after orgasm for both men and women, lasting briefly before returning to normal baseline levels.
- ✓Athletic performance: Sexual activity does not impair athletic performance unless it occurs within two hours of competition. Studies measuring grip strength, cycling speed, and weightlifting found no performance differences between men who abstained versus those who had sex the night before.
- ✓Sperm quality optimization: For conception, abstain two to five days before the fertile window to balance sperm count and quality. Beyond five days, DNA damage accumulates in sperm stored in the epididymis, reducing motility and viability despite higher volume.
- ✓Psychological effects: Online NoFap communities correlate with increased shame and worthlessness after ejaculation, unlike typical support groups. The guilt-based messaging creates stress around natural urges, though individual abstinence without community involvement poses no physiological harm.
What It Covers
Science Vs examines semen retention claims with urologist Justin Dubin and fertility specialist Brent Hansen, investigating whether abstaining from ejaculation increases testosterone, improves athletic performance, enhances sperm quality, or poses health risks.
Key Questions Answered
- •Testosterone levels: Abstaining from ejaculation for twenty days does not increase baseline testosterone levels. The only measurable testosterone bump occurs immediately after orgasm for both men and women, lasting briefly before returning to normal baseline levels.
- •Athletic performance: Sexual activity does not impair athletic performance unless it occurs within two hours of competition. Studies measuring grip strength, cycling speed, and weightlifting found no performance differences between men who abstained versus those who had sex the night before.
- •Sperm quality optimization: For conception, abstain two to five days before the fertile window to balance sperm count and quality. Beyond five days, DNA damage accumulates in sperm stored in the epididymis, reducing motility and viability despite higher volume.
- •Psychological effects: Online NoFap communities correlate with increased shame and worthlessness after ejaculation, unlike typical support groups. The guilt-based messaging creates stress around natural urges, though individual abstinence without community involvement poses no physiological harm.
Notable Moment
Researchers discovered sperm volume increases approximately twelve percent per day of abstinence up to four days, but DNA damage simultaneously accumulates in stored sperm, making frequent ejaculation beneficial for sperm health despite producing lower volumes per sample.
Episode Transcript
Hi. I'm Wendy Zuckerman. You're listening to Science Versus. Today on the show, we're pitting facts against fapping. That's right. With No Nut November just around the corner, we thought it was a great time to ask, what are the benefits of saving your seed and not ejaculating? And this is something that former tax accountant and current comedian and also my friend, Soren Jayamana, has been curious about for a little while now. Hi, Soren. Hello. How do you feel about, being introduced as a sort of semen retention curious? Oh, I thought you were gonna say as a former tax accountant. Yeah. That's correct. Now for for those who are, uninitiated, semen retention, I've now become very familiar with this term, but it it basically means you you retain your semen. You keep it in. You don't release it. Yes. When did you start getting curious about this semen retention? Well, yes. I guess, more recently as as I've sort of delved into, like, meditation and more kinda yoga, well, I would say tantra type stuff, which is, like, Hindu kind of, I guess, philosophy Uh-huh. And tantra in the West, we think of it as very sex oriented, but it's actually just kinda like ritualistic ways to to build meditation and practice that kind of stuff. A lot of those Eastern philosophies are based on energy and, like, is there are you leaking energy? Uh-huh. Is ejaculating leaking energy? Yeah. Yeah. And I guess that at a very high level, this is the stuff that you make people with. Mhmm. So it's like the creative force of life. Yes. And then if you're just kind of wasting it Giving it to a sock. Yeah. Giving it to a sock. It's funny because it is true that for thousands of years, men in particular have been conflicted over whether to fap or not to fap. Yeah. Right. And for some in the ancient world, semen was seen as this powerful thing. Sometimes this great powerful thing that could do super impressive stuff, like apparently the Sumerian god Enki came, and that's how we got the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Yeah, okay. And then, because the but then on the other hand, it's like this conflict that we've had for so long, because then you've got Hippocrates and Taoist mystical practitioners, and then the eighteenth century, you've got philosophers, and the nineteenth century, you've got American doctors, all on team cockblock, saying that things like masturbation and losing your semen weaken a man's body and brain. It's it's it is quite funny, actually, throughout history how much it's, like, all these big thinkers, and this is it's occupying a lot of space. Yeah. And a lot of these ideas are still out there Yeah. When you go online, and it was very interesting that there are just loads of guys out there. Loads is probably the wrong word. When you tell me what you're telling me. Or is it …
Get the full transcript (7,956 words) + summary by email — free
One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.
One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.
You just read a 3-minute summary of a 40-minute episode.
Get Science Vs summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.
Pick Your Podcasts — FreeKeep Reading
More from Science Vs
Protein-Maxxing: Is It Actually Bad For Us?
Sep 3 · 31 min
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Michael Kratsios: Trump's Science Agenda, Anti-Science Claims, Fauci's Damage, DEI & China
Aug 24
More from Science Vs
Sunscreen: Could It Be Toxic??
Aug 27 · 50 min
Huberman Lab
How to Improve Motivation & Overcome Procrastination | Dr. Masud Husain
Aug 24
More from Science Vs
We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?
Protein-Maxxing: Is It Actually Bad For Us?
Sunscreen: Could It Be Toxic??
Hank Green: What No One Tells You About the Algorithm
We Solve the 49ers Viral Conspiracy Theory
Weight Cycling: Is 'Yo-Yo Dieting' Dangerous?
Similar Episodes
Related episodes from other podcasts
All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg
Aug 24
Michael Kratsios: Trump's Science Agenda, Anti-Science Claims, Fauci's Damage, DEI & China
Huberman Lab
Aug 24
How to Improve Motivation & Overcome Procrastination | Dr. Masud Husain
The Jordan Harbinger Show
Aug 9
1366: Gut Health | Skeptical Sunday
Huberman Lab
Jul 27
Your Top Health Questions Answered
Huberman Lab
Jun 25
Essentials: The Science of Eating for Health, Fat Loss & Lean Muscle | Dr. Layne Norton
Explore Related Topics
This podcast is featured in Best Science Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.
Read this week's Health & Longevity Podcast Insights — cross-podcast analysis updated weekly.
You're clearly into Science Vs.
Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Science Vs and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.
Start My Monday DigestNo credit card · Unsubscribe anytime