AI Has Introduced Product Slop

People are talking about, okay, these agent decoders, right? I think what's happening now is, and we've kind of warned against this, but there's a new phrase now. So we talk about AI slop, like content slop right now. There's product slop because it's so easy to build all these products. So when you, we can ship at a 100 times the speed, the problem now, Neil, is whatever you build into Ubersuggest or whatever, you know, you build into answer to public, there could be risk where you, you have too much features and it's too much crap and it then it inundates the entire system. So more things faster is rarely ex than a recipe for excellence. When it takes weeks to ship, you justify every feature. When it takes hours, you ship everything. Why not? It feels like progress and momentum. It's what we call perceived progress. Yeah. But it just hasn't just introduced a, product slop. It's introduced marketing slop. It's introduced engineering slop. It's introduced slop everywhere because people are doing a lot of stuff that they don't need to do. The amount of messages I get on a weekly basis of people showing me cool shit they're doing with AI, and no joke, more than nine out of 10 times, they're like, this is never gonna make anyone any money or do anything from they just created a new cool shiny thing for marketing, So talk speaking about Slop, I saw this post on LinkedIn, this guy, Mike Cornugian wrote this. So he said we published 2,000 AI generated articles across 20 new domains with zero authority to see if raw AI content could rank. Here's what happened in just thirty six days. So 71% of pages got indexed, eight sites rank for 1,000 keywords each, 122,000 impressions over 240 clicks in total. That seems very low. Five sites hit top 30 for 30% of their keywords, but here's the plot twist. All articles disappeared from search after three months. What went wrong? First, it's obvious that all the sites were brand new. No trust signals, no domain authority, nothing to make Google believe you're worth citing. Plus the content was fully AI generated with no human input or originality, No author with strong e a a t signals. How do I know that's a reason? Because we tested six AI assisted articles on our main blog. The difference, night and day. Still ranking with three in the top 10 after six months, 550,000 impressions and growing featured as sources in AI overview. So, yes, AI generated content can rank easily, but it doesn't stay there unless the content is updated and supported by enough trust signals for Google, AK SEO. Yeah. Yeah. I you you can't just spam. We've been saying this for ages. Everyone who's just creating tons of AI junk content, is it gonna do well? It needs to you need to involve a human. You need to build trust. You …