Skip to main content
Eye on AI

#329 Izhar Medalsy: How AI Solves Quantum Computing's Biggest Problem

61 min episode · 3 min read
·
Izhar Medalsy

Episode

61 min

Read time

3 min

Topics

Fundraising & VC, Leadership, Design & UX

AI-Generated Summary

Key Takeaways

  • Digital Twin Validation: Quantum Elements demonstrated digital twin accuracy by running Shor's algorithm on IBM hardware, achieving 80% baseline accuracy, then using crosstalk analysis from thousands of simulated qubit configurations to identify an error suppression remedy. Implementing that remedy on the physical IBM system raised accuracy to 99% — surpassing the previous literature high of 70% and providing a concrete closed-loop validation method.
  • Noise Modeling at Scale: Effective quantum simulation requires modeling five specific noise channels: T1/T2/T-star decoherence rates, 1/f noise, crosstalk between qubits, and leakage into higher energy states. Crosstalk is particularly problematic at scale — calibrating one qubit destabilizes neighbors, creating a whack-a-mole effect. Beyond roughly 100 qubits, manual calibration becomes unmanageable, making AI-driven optimization the only practical path forward.
  • Density Matrix Advantage: Classical quantum simulators require 10,000+ repeated "shots" to build a statistically valid result. Quantum Elements' digital twin produces the full density matrix — the complete probability distribution of all outcomes — in a single run. This capability lets developers pause simulation mid-circuit to inspect system state, something physically impossible on real quantum hardware, enabling precise noise attribution and labeled dataset generation.
  • AI Training Data Generation: Quantum hardware is too scarce, expensive, and unstable to serve as an AI training source — calibration parameters drift daily and hardware generations turn over rapidly. Digital twins solve this by generating massive labeled datasets at low cost, including representations of future hardware states. This enables training AI decoders for quantum error correction that remain robust across hardware generations, not just current machines.
  • Logical Qubit Milestone: Using digital twin optimization, Quantum Elements achieved logical qubit behavior on IBM hardware — previously demonstrated only by Google on superconducting systems. Separately, the platform pushed Rigetti hardware to 99.9% single-qubit gate fidelity. Three metrics to track quantum progress: two-qubit gate fidelity approaching 99.99%, physical qubit counts toward IBM's 10,000-qubit target, and reducing the physical-to-logical qubit ratio below 10-to-1.

What It Covers

Izhar Medalsy, CEO of Quantum Elements, explains how his company builds large-scale digital twins of quantum hardware — simulating up to 100 noisy qubits on classical supercomputers — and uses AI to identify noise sources, optimize error suppression, and push algorithm accuracy from 80% to 99% on IBM's platform using Shor's algorithm.

Key Questions Answered

  • Digital Twin Validation: Quantum Elements demonstrated digital twin accuracy by running Shor's algorithm on IBM hardware, achieving 80% baseline accuracy, then using crosstalk analysis from thousands of simulated qubit configurations to identify an error suppression remedy. Implementing that remedy on the physical IBM system raised accuracy to 99% — surpassing the previous literature high of 70% and providing a concrete closed-loop validation method.
  • Noise Modeling at Scale: Effective quantum simulation requires modeling five specific noise channels: T1/T2/T-star decoherence rates, 1/f noise, crosstalk between qubits, and leakage into higher energy states. Crosstalk is particularly problematic at scale — calibrating one qubit destabilizes neighbors, creating a whack-a-mole effect. Beyond roughly 100 qubits, manual calibration becomes unmanageable, making AI-driven optimization the only practical path forward.
  • Density Matrix Advantage: Classical quantum simulators require 10,000+ repeated "shots" to build a statistically valid result. Quantum Elements' digital twin produces the full density matrix — the complete probability distribution of all outcomes — in a single run. This capability lets developers pause simulation mid-circuit to inspect system state, something physically impossible on real quantum hardware, enabling precise noise attribution and labeled dataset generation.
  • AI Training Data Generation: Quantum hardware is too scarce, expensive, and unstable to serve as an AI training source — calibration parameters drift daily and hardware generations turn over rapidly. Digital twins solve this by generating massive labeled datasets at low cost, including representations of future hardware states. This enables training AI decoders for quantum error correction that remain robust across hardware generations, not just current machines.
  • Logical Qubit Milestone: Using digital twin optimization, Quantum Elements achieved logical qubit behavior on IBM hardware — previously demonstrated only by Google on superconducting systems. Separately, the platform pushed Rigetti hardware to 99.9% single-qubit gate fidelity. Three metrics to track quantum progress: two-qubit gate fidelity approaching 99.99%, physical qubit counts toward IBM's 10,000-qubit target, and reducing the physical-to-logical qubit ratio below 10-to-1.
  • Hardware-Aware Stack Strategy: Unlike classical computing where a zero is universally a zero, every layer of quantum software — pulse calibration, circuit execution, error mitigation, error correction, and application algorithms — must be tuned to specific hardware. Quantum Elements serves customers across this entire stack by providing a configurable canvas where users input their own hardware parameters without disclosing proprietary designs, preserving IP while still benefiting from simulation-scale optimization.

Notable Moment

Medalsy revealed that Quantum Elements simulated over 100 noisy qubits — surpassing quantum error correction distance-seven, a threshold widely cited as the boundary beyond which classical devices cannot meaningfully simulate quantum hardware. The team continues pushing that boundary further, consistently exceeding their own expectations for how far classical simulation can reach.

Know someone who'd find this useful?

Episode Transcript

The idea is that if classical devices could mimic quantum devices, then we wouldn't need quantum devices. So going back to the digital twin, those qubits, you're right, they're notoriously noisy. They're very unstable. That's the beauty of it because that's kind of at the core of what quantum mechanics is. That you can get to 80% accuracy with Shor's on factoring the number 21. Is that right? We took this knowledge that we gained from our digital twin and implemented it on the IBM platform and got to 99% accuracy on Shor's algorithm. Can you start by introducing yourself and giving give your background, insofar as it's relevant, where you studied, what you studied, and how you came to Quantum Elements. And then we'll talk about Quantum Elements' use of large scale digital twins and AI to make noisy real world quantum hardware useful? Absolutely. Thanks for having me, Craig. My, I I studied physics and and, chemistry, back in Israel and focusing on nanoscale computational devices using quantum dots and and other, components. And these were kind of the early days of, you know, those kind of nano scale computational devices. I did my postdoc in Switzerland at ETH Zurich, kind of diving deeper into the field. Started my career in the industry, as a research scientist and very quickly switched to a business dev and, product and, took the product that actually developed as a scientist to the market, and that was quite a thrilling, and interesting, adventure and switched to a couple other, companies and built my first, startup, for a a few years. It was a very interesting journey, but maybe for a different podcast. And, a few years back, alongside my two, amazing cofounders, professor Daniel Lidar from USC, who is really, one of the world leaders in quantum error correction Cobi from Harvard, who is a leading experimental scientist in quantum. We, realized that in order to deal with those very unstable systems, meaning those quantum devices, you need to be able to use the ability of, to augment those system using classical devices, meaning creating a digital twins of those systems and best in breed classical tools that are used today for software development, in order to control them, accelerate their development, and ultimately enable end user applications on quantum. Yeah. And and when we spoke before, I was asking whether this is, when you when you say using classical hardware with us is using classical computers to run quantum algorithms, which there's a lot of, work in that field. But from my understanding, you're you're building digital twins of quantum hardware and then using AI to optimize, those that hardware, and and you have some pretty interesting results. Is that right? And if so, can you explain that? That's absolutely right. The idea is that, you know, if classical devices could mimic quantum devices, then we would need quantum devices. On the other hand, in order to allow AI and other …

Get the full transcript (8,046 words) + summary by email — free

One-time email with the complete transcript and AI summary of this episode. No account needed.

One email, no spam. We’ll also show you what SignalCast does.

Browse all Eye on AI transcripts →

You just read a 3-minute summary of a 58-minute episode.

Get Eye on AI summarized like this every Monday — plus up to 2 more podcasts, free.

Pick Your Podcasts — Free

Keep Reading

Books, tools, and gear mentioned in this episode

SignalCast may earn commission on purchases via these links. As an Amazon Associate, SignalCast earns from qualifying purchases.

Gear

  • by Rigetti

    the platform pushed Rigetti hardware to 99.9% single-qubit gate fidelity
  • by IBM

    Quantum Elements demonstrated digital twin accuracy by running Shor's algorithm on IBM hardware, achieving 80% baseline accuracy

company

  • Izhar Medalsy, CEO of Quantum Elements, explains how his company builds large-scale digital twins of quantum hardware — simulating up to 100 noisy qubits on classical supercomputers

More from Eye on AI

We summarize every new episode. Want them in your inbox?

Similar Episodes

Related episodes from other podcasts

Explore Related Topics

This podcast is featured in Best AI Podcasts (2026) — ranked and reviewed with AI summaries.

You're clearly into Eye on AI.

Every Monday, we deliver AI summaries of the latest episodes from Eye on AI and 192+ other podcasts. Free for one show.

Start My Monday Digest

No credit card · Unsubscribe anytime