The Moving Walkway Is Ending

What It Covers

Moving walkways evolved from ambitious 1870s urban transit proposals to airport fixtures, then declined as airports became shopping destinations. The technology succeeded only when scaled down from grand transportation visions to practical short-distance solutions.

Key Questions Answered

• •Infrastructure adoption pattern: Moving walkways failed as citywide transit but succeeded in airports by solving specific problems—moving passengers through 600-foot tunnels and five-football-field distances between gates, not replacing entire transportation systems.
• •Design over efficiency: O'Hare's 1980s tunnel with neon lights and Rhapsody in Blue transformed an 800-foot concrete passage into an experience. Successful moving walkways prioritize user enjoyment over pure speed, explaining why they persist despite minimal time savings.
• •Speed limitations: Paris Metro's 2003 accelerated walkway reached 7.5 mph but caused frequent falls, forcing speed reductions. Most walkways remain at 1-2 mph because faster speeds increase accidents, and studies show crowded walkways actually slow travel versus walking.
• •Business model shift: Airports removed moving walkways after 2015 because increased security means passengers arrive early and spend time shopping. When terminals function as malls rather than transit corridors, rapid movement becomes counterproductive to retail revenue generation.